Please take your time and read the blog rules

Feb 4, 2013

The Schmalturm

This is a translation of a Russian post, published on the developer's blog. I think it's actually pretty interesting and related to World of Tanks and it would be a shame not to have something like that in English, so... I hope the author doesn't mind :)

Author: kedoki
Original link:
Translated and redacted by: Silentstalker (please note it's not a perfect translation, I had to redact some sentences to make sense in English)

Background and development

My friend Lyocha truly believes that the Schmalturm was a stopgap measure - there were few resources, there were even fewer workers available, so it was needed to make the turret as simple and functional as possible without hindering the possibility to actually shoot. And shape-wise, the Schmalturm turret was really simple, compared to the Rheinmetall turret (standard Panther turret) and to the Porsche turrets, used on Tigers, it didn't have too many accessories. But that is the truth only partially.

The ideas to modernize the Panther turret reach back to 1943 for three reasons. The first was to improve the weak turret armor of the Panther turret without actually increasing the weight. The second was that by that time, the Panther II project was already scrapped and the soldiers needed something to fight with. The third was, the Panther turret was too complex and too slow to rotate manually - in order to rotate it fast, the engine had to be switched on and revved, which really messed up the ambush tactics. The turret also acted badly if the vehicle was standing on some kind of a slope. As we can see, the Schmalturm development was not an act of desperation.

And so it was that in 1943 the Germans tried to modernize the Panther turret. The main idea was to reduce the possible space where enemy shells could hit the turret, which implied making the frontal armor of the turret narrower. Even then it was planned to increase the frontal sloped armor effective thickness to 120mm, so the shells don't ricochet into the driver's ass. By 1944, Rheinmetall presented drawn development ideas. The first name of the new turret was to be "Turm Panther (schmaler Blende)" (Panther turret with narrow profile). This turret represented a mixture of good traits of the Porsche turrets from the King Tiger, and the Panther turrets - it was compact, light and had a narrow frontal profile in order to minimize the chance of enemy shell impact. It also respected the demand for new armament, which later allowed the Germans to develop a project of 88mm L/71-armed Schmalturm.

On the top of the turret it was possible to install a rangefinder and there was also the possibility of installing the periscope gun sights. Most of the standard Panther equipment did fit into the Schmalturm turret. So, as we can see, the turret equipment was very, very decent, it cannot be simply called an "ersatz" project.

Later, the turret project was handed over to the Daimler Benz company. Therefore, it's no surprise that the Schmalturm turret has a lot of similiarities with the VK3002DB turret. By that time the order for the turret development was updated: it was ordered to implement the possibility to convert the turret into the command version or the night fighting version by the tank crew itself. An interesting fact: the rear hatch was made from a sheet of metal, that was carved out of the rear armor plate itself. This allowed for better resource savings, resources that the Germany was running out of by then.

The first Panthers with new turrets were supposed to come out of the factory in 1945, but that didn't happen for obviously reasons - when the Allies came to the factories, all they saw were unfinished parts of the vehicles.

Comparing the Schmalturm with the Panther turret

Even so, could the Germans have reached their goal? The turret weight did decrease, while the armor protection increased. The turret weighted only 7,5 tons (Panther turret - 7,6 tons). The machinegun was changed into a newer model. Even though the turret was called "narrow", the effective volume was the same, there was no difference for the crew. The commander's copula was "sunk". The turret ring diameter remained at 1650mm.

The turret was hydraulically powered by the engine, but the manual turret rotation drive was enhanced: if the tank was standing on a slope, the loader could install a spare flywheel and he could help the gunner - and so the turret rotated even faster. But the most important fact was that the turret mechanism, despite this enhancement, got actually smaller and less expensive while the rotation of the turret became easier.

The vertical gun aim mechanism was also changed, allowing to raise the gun to 20 degrees up and lower it to 4 degrees below the horizontal axis. This mechanism has also become lighter, cheaper and more compact. The commander's copula also got lighter and more compact while keeping all its previous properties: it was possible to set up the stereoscopic rangefinder, a night vision device or even an anti-aircraft machinegun.

The loader profitted even more: in the initial version of the project, a special periscope was installed for him. Later this option was removed and the periscope hole was covered with an armored plug. But if the periscope was installed, all three of the turret crewmembers would have very good night and day battlefield overview possibility.

A question arises while reading about all these great properties of the turret: is this really such a great turret? Not at all. If you compare the Schmalturm to the King Tiger turret, the Schmalturm doesn't end up as the winner. It was the original Panther turret that was so bad that in comparison to it, the Schmalturm comes out as the winner.

Schmalturm in World of Tanks

The first problem is the weight: the turret weight should be 7,5 tons. In the game it weights in various versions 10,8 tons, 4,6 tons, 12,5 tons, 13,2 tons... that's bullshit.

Second problem: maximum elevation. In real life, it was 20 degrees. In the game:

- Panzer IV Schmal: 20 degrees (as IRL)
- Panther: 17 degrees
- VK3001(H): 18 degrees
- VK3002(DB): 16 degrees

The turret rotation spead was in real life bigger than the one of the standard turret of the Panther: the turret was lighter and there was the additional flywheel. In the game, it's vice versa: the Schmalturm rotates slower and with different speeds:

- Panzer IV Schmal: 24 degrees
- Panther: 26 degrees
- VK3001(H): 25 degrees
- VK3002(DB): 30 degrees
- Panther II: 28 degrees

View range: In real life it was very good: all the crewmembers had their own viewing devices,  night vision devices. In the game:

- Panzer IV Schmal: 370m
- Panther: 380m
- VK3001(H): 370m
- VK3002(DB): 370m
- Panther II: 390m

No complaints about the viewrange, but it's different every time.

Where to install it:

- Panther - as planned in real life
- VK3002DB - it had smaller turret ring, the installation of Schmalturm possible only if the whole hull was re-worked.
- VK3001(H) - I won't even comment on that
- Panzer IV - the Schmalturm was twice as heavy as the usual turret, the suspension wouldn't have survived that, but at least the turret ring is the same - remember the Panzer IV turret installed on the Panther hull.

Schmalturm mit 88mm L/71

Oh, that's a problematic topic. The thing is, in order to provide enough space for the loader to operate with a 88mm gun installed, the turret ring would have to be increased to 1750mm. The weird thing is, in the game the new turret with the new gun weights only like 1 ton more than the early Schmalturm model with the Panther gun.

With the new wider turret ring we can't even talk anymore about the turret installation on the VK3002DB and VK3001H. But the interesting part is, on the aforementioned tanks in the same turret, we have the 88mm. Glory to the great German designer Pasholok & Co.! And so, they glued the Daimler Benz gun mantlet on the short 88 despite the fact the gun mantlet fits only the LONG 88 and the Panther II is running around with the Krupp mantlet for a change. That's how they do it in Omsk. Pasholok wrote himself: there might be inaccuracies and mistakes, but the spirit (TM) is present.


  1. if you remember, serb stated "for a fact" according to their calculation, the mass of the Schmalturm was greater than the standard turret

  2. -The fact is the with the Schamlturm the gunner had a lower view angle ( around 4°), 'cause he only could look thru the new rangefinder, so he had a very low look at the battlefield.
    -And a funnier fact is that the skoda, in german order, worked on a loading mechanism that was able to load 4 shells with a new developed 7,5cm KwK 44/1, the funnie thing is that this thing decresed the space for the loader himself :)

  3. "Schmalturm mit 88mm L/71 ..."

    You know how it is:

    Was nicht pa├čt, wird passend gemacht!

    There is a reason for the hammer in the soviet flag ;-)

  4. SerB stated : 'we are using as much historical info as possible and we try to keep the in-game stuff historicaly accurate'
    And the fact that the schmalturm could mount only the l71 gun and not the short 88mm and the 75mm stick (l100), which didn't even existed, made me laugh.No medium with schmalturm in game has the l71, and the panther 2 fits the l71 only by mounting the krupp

    1. In the early state of the improvement was tested if a 7,5cm weapon of 100 calibers length fits into the new turret. I don't know if it fitted or not, but it existed.

    2. It did exist, it was hideously expensive and difficult to make as far as I remember, because the long barrel required different engineering procedures.

    3. Okay, then I'm sorry, I just need to finish my Spielberger books :) I just read the parts It says: H. ordered to start research to equip the Panther with an 7,5cm gun L/100 or bigger guns. And it was in the early state of Panther development, not in the improvment.

  5. "The first name of the new turret was to be 'Turm Panther (schmaler Blende)' (Panther turret with narrow profile)."
    "Even though the turret was called "narrow", the effective volume was the same"
    The exact translation of "schmale Blende" is "narrow (gun) mantle". Thats why the whole turret isn't really narrower. They changed from a full mantle over the whole front to a small and round one.

  6. "That's how they do it in Omsk."

    Ahh, home sweet home.

  7. I think there is something wrong with the gun depression data. Every source I have ever seen stated that it was 8 degrees with standard turret, and since Schmallturm isn't really lower, why would it allow for only 4?

    1. Only the Earlier Ausf D's turret could do -8 degrees since it was rounded at the bottom, which caused shells to ricochet into the roof.

      The in-game Panther is the later Ausf A which has the chin on the mantlet to remedy the shot trap.

      Problem is the chin also prevents the gun from depressing so it's -6 degrees in game.

      The Panther M10 has -8 degrees since its mantlet doesn't have the chin.

  8. can i just say i realy love articles like this? Is it a coincidence that the turret ring was the same as pz4? (i mean was that an important decision when the panter was designed, or was ik like well, that part and tooling is ready and it suits us anyway?
    also, any idea why they didnt opt for a eletrical turret drive? could have been fed by a second set of batteries or a small 2 stroke generator wich also serves to keep the main batteries full if engine is not running?(wich is usual nowdays not sure back then)

    1. Turret ring size is a decision that's connected with the primary gun choice (not for the gun itself, but the breech size, combined with enough space for the loader). 1650mm was perfectly sufficient for the 75mm guns and it was already there. Introducing a new element is not an easy process.
      Not sure about the electric drive, you'd have to ask a real expert. Try the historical section of the EU forums (the Challenger section, not the one at the end of the forums).

    2. Now that I think about it, it might have been the copper. Copper was in very short supply for wartime Germany and electric engines require a substantial amount of them. The German engineers' goal was to reduce the amount of strategic materials needed as much as possible, therefore they sometimes opted for solutions that weren't exactly the best performance-wise.

    3. well, i guessed also that this was a posebility, any chance the lack of strategic materials was important as well when choosing between some porsche electric transmission tanks, and some more conventional tanks besides the more known reasons? (like tiger/tigerP)


Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.