Tips

Please take your time and read the blog rules

Jun 4, 2013

World of Warships new trailer

Well... .this looks cool :)


139 comments:

  1. Replies
    1. no gameplay, no fap!

      Delete
    2. It's a CGI...calm the fap down.

      Delete
    3. Ships models in the trailer were taken from the game :P

      Delete
  2. Well i dont expect too much about this. Hope WT will make it better.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You cant compare it to WarThunder which is in development about 4 years and derived directly from gaijin game wings of prey. And BTW considering current states of affair in WT i would not expect much from it.

      Delete
    2. WT - Navypart...have you looked at the screenshots of the Japanese ships in WT?! they look like cheap plastic toys made into 3D compared to these....

      Delete
    3. ^ You compare WoWs CGI graphics to WT's in game graphics? Better put some glasses on next time when you compare two different materials.

      Delete
    4. There are already screenshots of WoWs game graphics, just search a bit. But I haven't compared yet.
      Btw. I do not believe in a good symbiosis between the three genres in WT. But lets see what gaijin is trying out...

      Delete
    5. Well, it comes all down to gameplay of those two games. Which one has the better control/gameplay/fun factors, i'll play it and of course "NO" to zero damage from 300+ mm shots.

      Delete
    6. "^ You compare WoWs CGI graphics to WT's in game graphics? Better put some glasses on next time when you compare two different materials."

      LOL, you need to put on your glasses mate, these are the actual in-game models ;)

      Delete
    7. They're not in-game models... Hell, if they were, the game would be unplayable due to WGs bad optimizing.

      Delete
    8. Hate to burst your bubble, but check the official forum - it is confirmed that these are in game models. (Actually they are pretty close to the already published screenshots as well). If anything the models in the video are somewhat less detailed than the actual models. And yes, WG at the moment is having trouble speeding up the FPS numbers due to the heavy models.

      Delete
    9. Until there is no gameplay, i see it as a CGI trailer and that's all.

      Delete
  3. the next wargaming grave.
    this will lie dead beside world of warplanes !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. True...true...

      Delete
    2. true...true... Angry school kids nerd rage every time about it xD

      Delete
    3. MWO, BF3, diablo3, starcraft3, gw2, sw:tor and maybe some other games were meant to kill wargaming. Guess what happened?


      Also, "WG KILLS WOT EVERY PATCH" should be a meme.

      Why don't you guys go masturbate over wargamings supposedly "dead body" on gaijin forums?


      orzel286_eu

      Delete
    4. Another childish WT-fanboy? :D

      Delete
    5. What's the matter fanboy, you can feel your doom coming?

      Delete
    6. "MWO, BF3, diablo3, starcraft3, gw2, sw:tor and maybe some other games were meant to kill wargaming."

      Just when you thought the internet couldn't get any stupider...

      Delete
    7. @hzero

      My thoughts exactly..

      Delete
    8. @orzel286_eu

      None of those games have anything to do with WoT or WG. SW:ToR and GW2 isn't even CLOSE to the same genre (WW2 - Fantasy/Sci-Fi)

      While the other two aren't classified as MMOs or tank games. Your fanboyism makes you blind and stupid.

      Delete
    9. Oh, then all those threads about it were just my imagination? Good to know...



      Oh wait - there WERE threads like that on wot eu forums... Who's blind now? :|

      orzel286_eu

      Delete
  4. WOWP Not good

    WOWS hopefully the game will play as well as it looks :-)

    TacP

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are there any in game screenshots?

      Delete
    2. WoWP still in closed beta and changed alot to good side since times of alfa. You can say good its or bad only whe game will be at least in open beta stage.

      Delete
    3. WoWp changed, but definitely not in a good way
      there are roughly 1000 players on the EU test server at peak hours

      Delete
  5. Youtube link pls
    Android 4.1 doesnt support flash :c

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Here you go:

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=-FK0Gp_Aiww

      Delete
  6. Wow WG makes the best trailers!!

    -kariverson

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Cool, wow, awesome, WoWs FTW BUT we now nothing of the game, no ingame footage or gameplay video. Don't let your high hopes carry you away, after all this is WG's game. And WG will always stay WG.

      Yeah they make good trailers, but you won't play the trailers.

      Delete
    2. great trailers, bs games for bs russians.

      Delete
    3. They can't add any game play footage the game isn't even in Alpha

      Delete
  7. I would have loved to see some in game footage but considering their alpha stage I doubt we`ll see such thing to soon. We`ll have to watch these Hollywood movies.

    ReplyDelete
  8. How did you manage to get an hidden video link?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's been posted in the WoW's forum:
      http://forum.worldofwarships.com/index.php?/topic/3474-world-of-warships-cinematic-trailer/

      Delete
  9. Imagine that computer need to play this game.
    WoT looks like shit and eat my PC like Crysis 3.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Pre-rendered movies don't impress me in 2013 anymore. Now in 1986 this would have been impressive.

    WG should show actually gameplay footage instead.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I'm afraid of "World of Carriers"... not "World of Warships" :(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This. From the creators of World of Artillery, I expect something like World of Carriers.

      Delete
    2. Silly whiners, aircraft carriers are warships, they changed the title from World of Battleships exactly to avoid similar critics. I guess that it's too late for WoT or maybe World of Armoured Vehicles doesn't sound too good.

      Delete
    3. yes yes YES!!!! :D
      And I just wondered will be CV rage just like arty rage.... And now we got answer. CV rage is already present! Thank You!

      luk0i

      Delete
    4. Yes, carriers have replaced battleships. Which is why they quickly add them in this game so they can roflstomp all ships and be the OP shit of the game.

      Delete
    5. Hellcat is "armoured" ??? ;)

      Delete
  12. I've been looking for something like this ever since Dangerous waters (game not the movie). Even though gameplay will look much different than this trailer I believe it will be fun to play. And if it doesn't fulfill my expectations there is WT :)

    ReplyDelete
  13. why so many airplanes in wows?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. because aircraft carriers are playable

      Delete
    2. Yeah, but pity that submarines aren't.

      Delete
    3. So we will have carries that'll works like Starcraft carrier?

      Delete
    4. No, there will be limited nuumber of planes per battle.

      Delete
  14. "Pre-rendered movies don't impress me in 2013 anymore. Now in 1986 this would have been impressive.

    WG should show actually gameplay footage instead."

    +10000000

    Why are people getting excited? It's just going to disappoint as much as WoT and WoWP.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "It's just going to disappoint as much as WoT and WoWP."

      I don`t know what are you expecting from a game but WoT it`s an amazing free to play game.
      I agree that WoWP is pretty bad but anyone who claims that WoT is a bad game is just ignorant.

      Delete
    2. WoWP still in closed beta and changed alot to good side since times of alfa. You cant compare it to WarThunder which is in development about 4 years and derived directly from gaijin game wings of prey.

      Delete
    3. One thing makes me wonder - if somebody thinks that WoT, WoWP and generally WG's games suck - why does he read such blog?

      Delete
    4. Never said that WoT "sucked", you all should have a look at a dictionary sometime and you'll see that Disappoint does not mean something is bad. WoT itself is a great game but its very disappointing to see the game plagued with issues that have existed for quite a while now and have yet to be fixed.

      Some examples are, Client side hacking, 7.1 Headset Sound bug, Artillery being OP (they are on the right track with 8.6), Power Creep etc etc

      But the worst crime that Wargaming commits and why I will play more WT than WoT is that they simply ignore what the community wants, and as a matter of fact, they even go as far as to call them idiots and retards. They continually go back on their own words e.g. nerfing the super pershing, then not nerfing it and now saying that it will most likely go into the new patch with nerf. Now Granted, not all of the ideas the community brings forward are great, but that doesn't mean they can push all ideas into the "retarded" category and just ignore them.

      And the reason why I still come here is because I have hope, hope that maybe one day, WoT will truly achieve the potential it has. That's why I keep reading, and why I love FTR and that's why I'll still play WoT. <3

      Delete
  15. Great trailer - epic boring gameplay (at least to look at)

    ReplyDelete
  16. lets hope it will be better than wowp

    ReplyDelete
  17. There are still people judging games from cinematics?

    ReplyDelete
  18. I love how people are glorifying WT-tanks jet fail to see some obvious facts:

    WT-tanks is not even in beta, and its not going to start soon, so you can expect to wait at least year and half for game to go live, in the meantime WOT will advance even further.

    Garage battles that everyone praises about WT has one glaring flaw, imagine you start your game and end up with half of your team being complete idiots. In WOT you end the battle and enter a new one, in WT you have to play with the same idiots for 20-30 minutes... great fun -_-

    realism, tralalala im driving my king tiger, o sh*** a t-34/85 on my flank /bang/ -turret ring stuck, gunner and loader dead- have fun in my crippled tank now

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What? You can leave a battle in WT without any punishment and you can even play with the same nation/planes immidiately because your vehicles dont get locked till the end of the battle like in wot...

      Delete
    2. You are talking like WoT isnt total retard-fest all around.
      At least WT can reward individual skill instead of punishing you just because your team sucked balls.

      And this is what you DESERVE if you drive your king tiger so carelessly to allow a T-34-85 on your flank. Maybe instead you would prefer burning frontally on your every shot?

      Delete
    3. Borat- so i can choose to play with the retards or to abandon the team like a selfish pussy? yeah, great... Like other pussy players in wot that say they are leaving battle for xyz reason, they can only expect a shell in their ass... only thing worse that campers in wot are AFKers and pussy quiters.

      Kazomir
      No its not, but my average wot game is 5-6 minutes long, average garage battle in WT is 3-4 times longer... hmmm im so thorn between what is better for me...

      -you mean burn frontally and put out the fire on a click of the button (or with new gold FE even easier) vs getting my gearbox destroyed (if WT will be realistic, there will be no saving throws) and render me immobile for the rest of the battle or my death... again.. im thorn between choices....

      do i also deserve it also if there is a suicider that only goal is to fire one shot before death?

      Delete
    4. I smell a butthurt fanboy here...

      For me it doesn't matter whether I get stuck in bad team because WT's greatest strength comes from the fact that you don't care whether you win or lose, its still fun. You can't say the same about WoT. You can also play historical or full real battles, and there you have only one plane to use.

      Realism is great, you see, now in WT you can kill the top planes with reserve plane which is awesome, you can't simply kill a 10 tier with 1 tier in WoT. Not to mention huge maps instead of WoT's 1km x 1km max. No unreal HP system but real damage models (that's what is really cool about the planes).

      "im driving my king tiger, o sh*** a t-34/85 on my flank /bang/ -turret ring stuck, gunner and loader dead- have fun in my crippled tank now" Yeah, like that couldn't happen in WoT too :P

      What come for the waiting part, I guess tanks will come in July-September timeframe and I honestly don't care when its going live because we can keep the tanks/planes/ships we have researched/bought during beta, for me it almost feels like a complete game to which new stuff is being added. Not to mention that it has less bugs than WoT :P.

      Delete
    5. OMG. Dude, WT tanks AND Navy are expected before end of this year! I know that they may be (and probably will be) some delays, but still. Fact is that WoT will advance even further, but problem is that WoT has been advancing backwards lately.
      It is WoT where you need to wait for end of the battle to use your tank again, in WT you just quit battle (when you've lost all of your assets, or just got bored) and your vehicles are useable at once. Plus, crews remember how to operate any tank they've previously used, so bye-bye retraining fees and leveling up shitloads of crews.
      And if you manage to get your tank crippled, all you'll need to do is just return to your base - if you repair it there, you won't spend a penny for repairs.

      Delete
    6. comparing WT maps for planes with wot tanks maps- fail

      comparing wot system of chances for module damage with WT "if it gets hit it will be destroyed" - fail (that works for planes but tank battles will be a lot different)

      im not a fanboy, i cant wait for WT as i like realism (i also think, due to that the game will be greatly imballanced, as simulations always are) a lot, but purposely ignoring faults of the game is childish and retarded, im just being realistic. WT is not better than wot because it will be different. Its like comparing COD and ARMA, both are shooters, but entirely different game approaches.

      i dont even have to mention WT brutal pay to win business model... If you think wot is bad, what will you say when you see new players playing around in fully decked out planes/tanks with maxed out crew while you, with triple battle count still are not half way there...

      Delete
    7. If WT plans the role of arty more carefully then no question what to play. WT tank battles of WoT-world of arties games

      Delete
    8. "If WT plans the role of arty more carefully then no question what to play. WT tank battles of WoT-world of arties games"
      If WT plans NO arty, than it will be great! Who needs arty when you have planes above you, and ships shooting at you?

      Delete
    9. You know the world war mode? It will have as big if not bigger maps than current, and as they promised 100 player ground unit battles, those can't happen in 1km x 1km area. I see no reason why would they end up in maps similar to WoT.

      You just compared the 2 games yourself in the first post. They are different, I compare them by the fact which is more fun. I have 20k+ battles in WoT, I like it to some extent but WT just is more fun. The reason I still play WoT is that there are no ground units in WT yet. WoT would be ok if they removed gold ammo entirely and limit the arty cap to 3 (not necessary if 8.6 balances the situation) among with other issues.

      The gold currency in WT is so cheap that I don't mind. Besides in the end the player skill is the determining factor instead of maxed crews etc.

      Delete
    10. WT fanboys, wtf are you doing here? You fail at internetz so hard, that you can't find wt forums?

      Would you GTFO, please?


      orzel286_eu

      Delete
    11. I prefer nasty arties which hopefully gets rebalanced over multiple battleship guns and bombers targetting me.
      I prefer "idiots" in my team who at least mostly want to win the game and take arties out over being totally helpless against bomber and battleships when the fighters do what you say: "just want some airkills because this is fun for me. Winning or teamwork is not important. Who cares about some of our tanks or ground units get killed"
      I prefer paying a relatively "low" amount of credits for repair and wait a few minutes until I have my tank back over waiting hours to days! for a repair if i do not have the huge amount of birdies (or what they call their currency) they request.
      I prefer 1-2 minutes of positioning in a 1sqkm map over driving 10 minutes to the front and get bashed from a Ju-87.
      I prefer intense city fights and infights over a "sorry Maus-driver, the t-34 tracked you and got killed. There is no enemy left in your area and you cannot repair. Please leave"
      I prefer raging about insta-deaths in every 20-30 battles over insta-deaths 2-3 times every battle
      I currently prefer a good game which gets updates for over 2 years now over non-alpha-status release promises for in 5 months (3 genres in one game is so complex, there is NO CHANCE, they will release this year)

      Delete
    12. @orzel286_eu

      Again you are just a retarded fanboy trolling. If you want to troll learn it's art first and then come back because right now you are only making a fool of yourself.

      Delete
    13. It's funny how WT is mentioned in the same sentence as realism. It may be some what realistic in classic modes, but the one everyone plays are the arcade mode and that one is so far from real that it can barely be called a flight sim anymore. But I am sure it will be popular as plenty of people likes easy games and it helps that you don't have to learn to fly a plane to shoot people down.

      Delete
    14. The reason why you can kill any plane in WT is because they don't care at all about realism. In real life so were several late war plans too well armored to actually get hurt by the early war light machineguns.

      Delete
    15. If you want to fap over how great gay thunder is - GTFO to gayjin forums ffs.


      Every time I read the comments on ftr, some topic on WOT forums it always comes to "wt this, wt that, wt sucks better than my gf, can I marry gaijin ceo" etc.
      Why do you bother playing wg games if you think they're crap? Why do you bother posting on a site that has NOTHING to do with a game you love so much? You think you're crusaders, leading a charge on teh evil wg devs and helping the poor, enslaved and brainwashed players still playing wot/wowp? You're so fucking wrong...

      Honestly - I don't give a flying fuck about wt. But since it's hyped on sites I visit and they're wot related - it 1)doesn't make sense 2)becouse of 1 - it pisses me off 3)no thank you, I'll stick with wg, I'm not interested in wt, I'M HERE TO READ ABOUT WOT FFS 4) becouse of 3 - I'm even more pissed, since there's so much totally irrelevant BS that wt fanboys love to spew around, taking space.

      Fuck you very much, take your wt elsewhere, nobody's preventing you from making your own site about it where you can fap all day long about this magnificent game that will make wg bankrupt SOON (TM).

      Now GTFO.

      /rant

      orzel286_eu

      Delete
  19. Unnecesary cheese in the burning volcano...

    ReplyDelete
  20. WT no prem ammo/no stupid MM/your not bound on idiots/the game is not over in 3min/low prem vehicle cost/better balance vehicels/no trolling selffish devs/you got high quality info about the game aaaaand its a fucking beta that has all this what wot never will get

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. if WT doesnt have APCR and HEAT ammo it will be less realistic than wot, so dont count on that

      MM is the same, you cna end on top or bottom

      yes you are, you can play the best game ever and still lose just like in wot

      the battles in WT are only longer because you can drive more than 1 plane in a single match, nothing special

      cant comment on balance, but considering opinions of my friends who played it a lot, thats complete BS

      instead of trolling devs you will get even bigger money grabbers (you have to pay for beta)

      Delete
    2. Probably WT will have sets of ammunition - smoke set, antiarmor set, antiinfantry set etc each unlocked with certain amouny of xp, best set would included 60% of HE, 30% of AP, 5% of Smoke and 5% of HVAP.
      And yet its far more realistic than WoT cause there is no damage but only modules.
      Also on HB you have only one plane wit quite ralistic model set in historical background - something we're waiting in WoT since closed beat and still we don't have it.

      Delete
    3. anon above:
      "you have to pay for beta"

      You f*** mad bro?!?!

      Delete
    4. In WoT you also have to pay for beta which is called released game. Guess who is mad now.

      Delete
    5. "you have to pay for beta"

      Ever heard of verison 0.8.5? Or anything before it? Dude you just made yourself look like a fucking idiot.

      Delete
    6. ah yes, people that think that beta is 0.x and full game is 1.x hahahahahahhaha

      human stupidity is infinite

      hey guys, i got a program its version 1.01, i only have 1 line of code but its full program, want to buy?

      Delete
    7. HB would perhaps be relevant if anyone actually played it instead of the ultra unrealistic arcade mode.

      Delete
  21. fell the power of the 400mm !!!! naval guns :P

    ReplyDelete
  22. Shame it won't look like that

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I see, you are not a focus-tester :D

      Delete
  23. Off topic: Is there any info will there be a specail on EU server regarding 5000 gold giveaway for playing 200 battles in WoWp?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Here is info:

      Yanks get special only,because Major_rampage part allready started,
      http://worldofwarplanes.com/news/228-ground-control-major-rampage/
      ,and as all they are being connected, some natural fertilizer for EU , and some gold for NA.

      It is that simple.

      Delete
    2. Cant wait to get my 5000gold baby! 200battles in wowp is easy. Thanks WGNA! shame euro players dont get anything.

      Delete
  24. Lots of idiotic people claiming either WT or WoT/WP/WS is better than the other.

    The fact that gayfanboyism like this has been present on diff games of the same genre (e.g. LoL and DotA2, Hawken and MechWarrior Online) and has bear no real fruits and simply proves that you fellas who like to claim one is better than the other are nothing but butthurt gaytards. Go eat some balls you faggots.

    Anyway the trailer looks nice, but why show off IJN? o_O) Oh well cause maybe they got like the best naval fleet on the very early stages of the War.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think because the first two trees to be released will be USN and IJN

      Delete
  25. yea, this game will be worse then WOT. USSR battleships were pretty much non existant. I cant even imagine the BS their going to try to pull off on this one.

    "you in the west never heard of the greatest bbs the russians created"

    Of course their all blueprints, its the natzis fault, always the natzis fault.

    LMFAO.

    This game will be even a bigger joke historically.

    Serb quote; " Dont like Russian Bullshit? Dont eat Russian Bullshit".....

    FU

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I can't wait to see a bunch of russian ww I era dreadnoughts owning everything.

      Delete
    2. I hope you realize that German ships really weren't very good at all anyway. If they suck in WoWS it actually would be completely accurate.

      Delete
    3. "I hope you realize that German ships really weren't very good at all anyway."

      But the FÜHRER told him something else. And the FÜHRER never lies. So all Gerrrrrman tech must be the best übertech ever.

      RU bias? Yeah in a game were every US tank roflstomps the russians. Didnt know that in reality US tanks were ru and ru/UDssR tanks were nonrussian... logic o.O

      Delete
    4. The first BBs the Russians ever made were modified versions of the first Italian Dreadnought.

      At least there will be some non paper BBs. All the carriers are paper.


      Also the Germans get the largest guns in game (19")

      Delete
  26. The teaser looks awful. That will only mean the game itself is 3x worse.

    Wargaming should just sell it's whole franchise to EA and retire. Gaijin will win, and we don't even need to see how their ground forces and naval combat will play to know that it will be superior to the WoT,WoWP,WoWS franchise.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Are you a prophet or something? I suppose you aren't, so you should have written "Gaijin's WT has quite a chance of being better" instead of "Gaijin will win"
      I can't understand why the hell are the fanboy wars between WT and World of... series. Play the game you like, but let the others play the game they might like.
      This is mostly a WoT oriented website, anyway. I have no right to kick you out of here (that is Silentstalkers right), but do me a favor and stop with WT fanboism on WoT oriented site. It is nearly the same as on the WoT forum. If you think WT is better, stay on WT forum and sites about WT. If you prefer WoT, stay on WoT forum and on the sites which focuses on WoT.
      Regards, Hustodemon

      Delete
    2. I see you're confused, so let's clear up. There will always be a war in the game scene, where fanboys side with one of the two most dominant games in it's genre, like quake vs unreal, bf vs cod, mario vs sonic, gran turismo vs need for speed and so on. WoT vs WT is just another stupid fan war mostly caused by young people who, instead of playing both and compare them on a reasonable level, start to take side with it and blindly troll each other "my game iz betah than yourz, cause bla bla...", hiding the negative facts about their games. Such people i describe as "cakes", cause you want to throw them into a wall when you're fed up with their behavior.

      Delete
    3. May i just ask why you think it looks terrible?

      Delete
  27. WT fanclub, can you please go and pat each others back somewhere else? It is not really interesting to read how incredible your pay to win game will be when it it reaches open beta so you can start paying for it. Bye bye

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I tried WT and hated it, so I am definitely outside of your WT fanclub critera.

      Now, in that teaser WOWS looks crap.

      Delete
    2. You are really cute Grolim "your pay to win game"---> do you see gold ammo, gold consumables anywhere?

      Delete
    3. That are.. uhm... available for credits? Nope. Anyway, I dislike the upgrade system there, and the respawn thingy. Liked the maps.

      Delete
    4. And um... how do you get enough credits? Prem tanks. Which are if I'm not mistaken available for gold only.

      Delete
    5. Or low tier tanks. Nobody puts a gun to your head to buy premiums. And nobody stops you from getting to tier X if you don't pay. Yeah it takes longer, but that's the idea isn't it? I've played for 2 years and payed something like 30 euros in total. So yeah, not impressed by your arguments.

      Delete
    6. If you seriously can't make enough credits to support the use of APCR/HVAP/HEAT shells in reasonable quantities without paying money, you're terrible at the game and shouldn't be playing anyway.

      Delete
    7. So, I should farm all day along with my tier 5 tanks to get enough credits to buy ammo for clan wars? Makes sense.

      Delete
    8. Since when was getting into CW a requirement for winning? This topic was on Pay2Win, not on CW. Yes, to get into CW you do probably have to buy at least one tier 8 premium, but getting into CW isn't a requirement to play the game. I have over 16,000 battles and haven't touched CW at all.

      Delete
    9. I've been testing the "full gold" option on test servers (I don't have any top tier tanks on live) and generally losses were somewhere around 100-120k credits. Let's say you earn avg 15k for tier 5 match that lasts for ~5 minutes.

      120k/15k = 8 matches to make up; 8*5=40 minutes. Not bad.

      So, the "OMG YOU NEED PREM ACC/PREMTANK TO PEWPEW GOLD AMMO" is bullshit.

      orzel286_eu

      Delete
    10. First off, yeah, go full gold... Why? Do you drive a seriously impotent tank that can't normally pen anything in its tier? You can't ever hit a weakspot? You are so braindead that you can't switch between ammo types? Just give me one good reason? I drive a shitload of tanks with small canons for their tier (Superpersh, B2, Valentine II, T1E6[yeah, all premiums]), and I keep a couple of gold ammo, but rarely use it. Not even my T32 that has a weak canon for it's role doesn't need prem ammo so often. So just why?
      Also, don't wanna play a lot of games to support your hightiers? Well then maybe you can give something back and support the game? Or maybe start playing better. You do realise you can loose really little if you play well. My average tier IX game is even and tier X is -5000 if I die. With consumables, normal and premium ammo when needed. And for crying out loud, YOU DO NOT LIKE THE GAME, DO NOT PLAY IT!

      Delete
  28. Don't really care about a cgi trailer, but the fanboism is cute.

    I'd prefer both WG and Gaijin to floorish and oppose each other.
    A strong competition will keep the players happy.

    Why?
    Simple, both developers will need to top each other again and
    again.

    What happens without competition?
    *points at EA*

    Peo01

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Like the Mighty Jingles said, there better be good competition between WG and Gaijin, as the only winners will be us, the players.

      Delete
  29. Looks like World of Artillery to me.

    ReplyDelete
  30. you think arty is hard now? wait till you have to compensate for the 10' swells, I am sure most will hit nothing but water 90% of the time.

    It's nice to see torpedoes make an appearance though.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They've already said that turbulent waters aren't going to affect aiming.

      Delete
  31. I understand the WG fanboism, we're on a WoT dedicated site, but the hell are the Gaijin fanboys doing here? If you don't like this game or future ones, don't play and don't comment, and go play your game. Why on Gods green earth do you come here to bash a trailer? Really, go to the WT forums and stay there. Don't like WG and WoT? Leave please.
    On a on-topic note, yeah, the trailer looks nice, but aside from the ship models that look nice-ish, it tells me nothing about the game itself. And hey, WoT worked, I still enjoy WoWp from time to time, and I have faith it'll go better.

    ReplyDelete
  32. WT fanboys are funny.
    Their own forums are FLOODED with "ZOMG RIP WG!!!1!" posts, then they go to OTHER forums and post the same shit, and they think WG is the one with all the fanboys.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well SerB with his attitude deserve to be kicked from game industry once and for all, don't you think?

      Delete
    2. @Tupinambis

      "...and they think WG is the one with all the fanboys."

      What are you then, if not just that? ;)

      WG has a lot of blind fanatical fanboys, Gaijin has some fanboys that aren't all blind but some are pretty excessive.

      Delete
    3. Serb is an immortal timelord who went back in time and falsified all the german gun penetration tables .
      He is now building up his power from drinking all the Wehraboo tears for his next project .
      To nerf WT ... Coming fall 2014 .
      Soon™

      Delete
  33. You know, I'm fairly certain that 90% of WT's fanbase is butthurt pubbies who got smacked a few times on the WoT forums and now are all circlejerking each other off about how big of victims they and how their "big bro" WT is going to beat up those meanies at WG for them!

    Really guys, it's pathetic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nope, WG fanboys are mostly survivors from pathetic WoT hating this game for promises of making very good tactical tank game which leaded them to lost time and money on that game and still this promises are unfulfilled. They are not pathetic they are disappointed.

      Delete
    2. Yup he mad.
      Most of us like the game as it is and I hope they don't change the core mechanic based on promises they made during beta .
      It looks like you found a game whose mechanic you like , that er they have not fully explained yet good on you . Just keep your butthurt to a minimum please.

      Delete
  34. WG announce In the near future.

    "Chinese Warship tree comming soon"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I actually wouldn't be surprised if China gets a branch in WoWP.

      Delete
    2. "Turkish and Zimbabwian Warship tree coming soon for WoWs! Keep your eyes peeled!"

      Delete
    3. The Chinese might have couple of ships implemented as Premium ships for the Japanese, but thats about it.

      The Turks might have some ships in the Team Europe Tree

      -mr3awsome

      Delete
  35. I find it ironic that people that haven't even been to the forum are going
    "OMG THIS SUCKS SO MUCH< RUSSIAN BIAS< NERF ARRTY!" etc.

    -_-

    ReplyDelete
  36. WT GAMES OWNS SERBS BALLS MAKES WG GAY BOYS CRY AT BED.
    ONE HAND DEAL 2500 ALFA,CLICK,CLICK,OTHER JERKS ON SERB PIC.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. no matter what u take, take more... or less...

      Delete
  37. I thought we are better than CoD or BF fanboys.....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I thought that too.
      Well, it looks like people never change...
      Regards,
      Hustodemon

      Delete
  38. Do want! WoWp was not for me, but big ships are like big tanks and I do want my Bismarck! And Graf Spee.. And Yamato.. And and and.. :D

    -Yuki

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Bismarck - tier 8
      Yamato - tier 10
      Graf Spee - low tier

      Delete
  39. You guys ask for game play footage well it does exist but you need to LOOK for it.

    World of Warships First Gameplay
    Published on Feb 20, 2013

    Want to see more or join Closed Beta? Visit
    www.world-of-warships.blogspot.com

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7sx3qu5EF8

    Enjoy,

    NEMO

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not WoW. That's Battlestation Pacific.

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.