Tips

Please take your time and read the blog rules

Feb 28, 2013

New poll is up

As you can see, I'd like to know your opinion on leaks in general. Please vote, thank you.

26 comments:

  1. Leakers should take care what to leak tho. When something is close it's worth it, when it's really uncertain it's not worth it and only confusing.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If WG can't keep supertester's mouth shut somehow, then it's WG's fault. If the "job" was anyhow paid (even in gold or anything like that), there would be much fewer leaks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is paid in gold, but not much.

      Delete
    2. is this the same as other wg employees? tought 250 gold/day?

      Delete
    3. Perhaps its rewarded in RU server but in EU

      _Quasar_:
      "This is a volunteer role, and no other benefits than earlier access to the game development process are planned for the moment. We are looking for dedicated players who are looking to help shape the future of the game."

      Well there is the "for the moment" thing, so I guess they wish to first test how well the EU players will be fulfilling supertester duties and if they will not make many leaks.

      Delete
  3. I voted for the first option. Just because it is required to know what's coming out and why WGRU is so stupid sometimes...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Well, I think it takes the suprise of something unexpected.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I'd only want Leaks of American Tanks..Could careless for russian Germ China & French..I do like the 1949 French tank that was teased when French tanks were released..but other than that no other tank but Americans interest me. So if yah got more U.S Tanks you know about besides the M60 T54E2/T5495 Then I would love to see em!

    ReplyDelete
  6. I would like to see some leaks of the long awaited tank lik Leopard 1, german 2nd TD line tanks, t54e2, british historical td-es (eg: Archer) and so on.
    And less crap tanks like the Back-turreted Lowe which will only upset me.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I'am very curious info about Polish tanks one of Polish Community member "Falathi" talk something about leaks of Polish tanks. But there is a problem there was no such leak in polish forum. Can u get some info form your source?

    There is a link to this post if u don't belive me:
    http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/152268-polskie-drzewko-zbior-informacji/page__st__140__pid__4129186#entry4129186

    This what he vrite mean:
    Hey,
    If there is some leaks fot this time then there are no much informations.For now we collect all informations about tanks - before there will be some playabled tanks and indide closed tests there will be a while ago

    ReplyDelete
  8. I don't like spoiling of a "surprise".. just because it's much more interesting and sweeter when you wait for something new! You don't know what could it be.. and then... kaboom, you get a video with faiLowe or something something.. :)

    In those moments I feel like I felt when I had only 30 battles and when I was happy because I just researched BT-2 - "This game is still fun!"

    greed is not a good thing.. :(

    Hajvanho

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well.. that's a good speech.

      but still.. I disagree with majority of others! :P

      Hajvanho

      Delete
  9. new poll is up.. but where are the STRIPPERS?!

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think the way you have handled leaks thus far is very well done - interesting, but not overdone, and with some useful caveats.

    ReplyDelete
  11. It's unfair on those EU players who were recently accepted into the Supertest. As we have now all became suspects of leaking information because of your source. That and there is a good chance WG will go back against it's decision to let EU players into the supertest.

    EU and US players were removed from the super test a long time ago because of the leaks. I don't want the same to happen against because one fucking idiot spoilt it for the rest of us.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Who said its an EU/US player whos leaking?

      hes speaking russian.. you know that?

      Delete
  12. I agree on things like FailLove being leaked and I understand why you did this.

    But as for other kind of leaks, well if it is stuff that is not yet confirmed as for planed future, I am not so sure if it should be leaked (but I admit that while saying this I am of course thinking the opposite), I understand why WG wouldn't want this. For example I don't think that a picture of Indien Panzer would be anything bad.

    Otherwise just "no exact tank stats" rule in leaks should be considered.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Of course leaks are bad from legal point of view - but there is also other side - nowadays leaking all kind of "secret" materials is pretty much a huge advertising option.. When we look around in the world - car manufacturers, consumer electronic manufacturers etc leak by themselves early prototype pictures and videos because this is free advertising in today's social networking... So - bring it on!

    ReplyDelete
  14. fuck da system, fuck da wargaming

    ReplyDelete
  15. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I fuck legal point, WG fuck us no in one line of law>We buy premium tank for money with good stats, after 1-6 months they nerf your premium tank and he can make shit. Thats why I fuck what WG think about that

    ReplyDelete
  17. WG likes to screw with us and troll us, time to return the favor.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yep. SS you are walking on thin line, but you know that without me.

      Delete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.