Author: OhSlowpoke
End Tier Vehicles
 |
| Conqueror, Centurion Mk7 and Chieftain tanks. |
As a rather... biased player of British
Vehicles I want to make a case for a couple of replacement vehicles,
or alterations to existing tanks. I've got a couple of ideas, mainly
for end-tier tanks within the British tree.
For starters, for better or worse, the
first Tier 10 tank of mine was the FV4202.
Perhaps not the best idea? Not the most
awful tank at T10, but its lack of an “effective” gold round
hampered my play and made me a laughing stock within my clan at my
inability to properly engage heavy tanks. My second T10 (the FV183)
has some of them cringing and others curiously asking me.
“Just what were the British
thinking?”
This isn't helped by the mostly
fictional FV215b (120mm), either, which received a buff that seemed
to hurt, rather than help it.
First, a little bit of education on
British doctrine, then, some suggestions for some vehicles and some
changes to existing tanks.
The British Doctrine – Post WW2
Era
The British and the Germans seemed to
switch doctrines post-war (or, more accurately post-Korea) Where the
ultimate second world war German design of a medium included a
powerful gun and decent armour (as seen in the Panther or mythical
E50 design), the British chose the more lightly armoured Comet and
Centurion tanks.
European powers after the war
(particularly Germany and France) did not believe that armour
protection was as important as speed and firepower and saw the rapid
increase of armour penetration (including HEAT rounds and anti-tank
guided missiles) as the death of armour. The assumption was that
armour could never be developed as fast as the guns and ammunition
that could defeat it.
The British experience couldn't have
been any more different. Experience in Korea showed that tanks absolutely
should be sufficiently armoured, for fear of being knocked
out by light or medium artillery, or tanks that may have been many
generations behind. During early development, the British had a
specific request that the new tank could be able to defeat hits from
“medium artillery” (one could assume in the range of 105mm-120mm)
with suitably thick frontal armour at extreme angles to provoke
deflections and maximize the armour’s effectiveness. They also demanded that gun depression should be no less than -10 degrees, and elevation at least +20- experience also gained in the hills of Korea.
The Chieftain Tank
 |
| Early Production Leopard (left) and Prototype Chieftain (right) |
An important note was that the
British felt during that time frame that the best weapon to kill a
tank is, in fact, another tank (this should be done at range, with a
tank that is markedly superior to it's competition) while the Germans
considered the best killer of tanks to be a highly specialized vehicle,
either a self-propelled gun such as the Jagdpanzer series or a
vehicle carrying missiles.
 |
| A mock up for the FV4201. This extremely early prototype
would make a good T9 tank | |
 |
| 120mm Gun. A Pike nose. Low Profile. What's not to like? |
Many of the techniques required to
build the FV4201 were tested in the FV4202, such as the reclined “supine”driver's position and the mantlet-less turret. With it's strange,
tiny turret, 120mm gun, and an almost Russian-looking pike nose, it
would make an interesting tank.
 |
This is the only armour scheme I've
been able to find. The listed 120mm of armor may be just the “pike”
on the nose of the tank, much like other British vehicles. I believe this to be the earliest 1959 production chieftain. |
Armour effectiveness, if the 72 degree
angle is taken into account, with a 120mm thickness, would be as
high as 388 or, if
the listed 85mm is true, a still respectable 275mm thickness from
line of sight. And while it has a well angled upper frontal plate,
its lower plate is 76mm at 45 degrees- barely enough to protect it
from low-tier threats. Upper plate would be 100% autobounce. Its engine would most likely be an early version of the Leyland L60, which was plagued with faults, poor horsepower and the tank's rapid increase in weight only made this worse.
 |
| An early prototype of the Chieftain. Note how low the suspension is. |
The early prototype of the Chieftain
would be an interesting vehicle. With well angled frontal armour, an angled
and sloped turret, low overall
profile and respectable gun, early Prototypes were armed with the
L1A1 gun, later with the improved L11 gun. It would have a rather unimpressive engine, a top speed of
40 kph
(governed, as normal) with a rather unsatisfactory HP out of it's engine and poor power-to-weight ratio.
The actual Chieftain is not actually outside of what is allowed in world
of tanks, particularly the early versions. It has no composite armour,
it still has
a rifled gun, traditional gun sighting systems (not too dissimilar
from the Centurion) and is powered by a rather conventional
multi-fuel engine. Prototypes P1-P6 were built in 1959 and onwards
and data was assembled from these vehicles to produce the production Chieftain.
FV215b (120)
This vehicle is actually a disaster.
I'm sure this isn't news to most people but it's a mostly fictional
vehicle. The 215b programme was designed to mount the massive 183mm
gun onto a chassis for testing purposes, and the rear-mounting was
required to balance the weight of the huge gun across the chassis.
What sense is there in rear-mounting the Conquerors turret onto the
rear when it fits in the centre just fine?
It's current armour isn't historical
and was simply added by wargaming to make the tank feel more like a
heavy. Perhaps the tank's model shouldn't be wasted as it isn't
outside the realm of possibilities, considering the mere existence of
the Caernarvon.
My suggestion is a gameplay based one,
mainly. Speaking from a game design standpoint, the problem with the
current FV215b is that it doesn't have a niche. It just doesn't do
anything that the T110E5 does better- aside from a tiny bit
more DPM, inferior armour, poor gun layout and engine fires, I
suppose. I think perhaps moving the vehicle as a Future T10 Tank
Destroyer for a possible Turreted line would be best.
Return it's armour to pre-buff levels,
flip it's gun stats with the current Tortoise's gun. You could lower
it's health to 2200 – 2300. You'll have an interesting T10 TD that
relies not on alpha (like many of the TDs), and yet, not an
autoloader. Rather, you'd have a TD that can reliably hit a target
every 6 seconds for a reasonable amount of damage with good soft stats
(accuracy on the move, turret rotation accuracy, gun accuracy,
penetration, etc.).
Much like the 183 is a TD that seems
exclusively designed for close range “blooping” of targets, the
215b (120) would ideally be specialized in long range plinking, weak
armor and a poor turret layout and lowish health would balance out
the good DPM, Penetration, Accuracy, and Aim-time.
But, what would replace it in the
current “heavy” slot? I've got a proposal, but not nearly enough
detail.
FV4202
 |
| FV4202 was mainly a testbed vehicle for the Chieftain. |
The FV4202's problem in game is twofold. It is
absolutely underwhelming in every bit of it's hard stats. It's gun,
armor, speed, camo value and otherwise. There are tanks
that do what this vehicle does better at every turn.
For starters, I do not have an understanding of
where, exactly, wargaming has figured that the FV4202's speed was
governed to 40 km, like the Centurions' was. Perhaps it was an assumption, of course, given the standard British doctrine- but with a 20 hp/tonne
ratio, one could imagine that the extra horsepower and lightened
weight could have been easily used to increase the speed of the tank
anywhere from 45 – 50 kmh. If someone has proof that the 4202's
speed had a governer, I'd love to see it, but in my research, it
wasn't. In fact, I've failed to find the actual listed top speed of
the tank. It seems wargaming may have simply copy-pasted the governor
from the Centurion.
The second problem with the 4202 is the
gold round. HESH on the 183 is extremely good because it has
relatively high penetration numbers and a huge damage pool, neither
of which it has on the 4202. Most player reviews and subjective
testing has shown that it is simply an ineffective choice, it's poor
penetration and unremarkable damage pool makes it a poor choice to
use over the standard armour penetration round. This could be easily
solved with a buff that might be a bit unhistorical- increasing the
armour penetration of the HESH round to 250-270mm would make the
round a lot more consistent. A further increase of it's damage to
perhaps 500-520 damage would help as well.
Two small changes could easily make the
4202 a wonderful, effective vehicle and maintain its usefulness
during clanwars as well as pub-matches without simply slapping a HEAT
round on as a gold.
AFV Weapons Profile Chieftain and Leopard Development - Lt-Col Michael Norman
AFV Weapons Profile Chieftain and Leopard Description- Lt Col Michael Norman
Chieftain - Rob Griffith
----- Next time, Vickers Tanks, Maybe some Australian stuff!
.jpg)
.jpg)
