- game balance (tank winrates) is analysed after every patch
- the fate of GW Panther (whether it will move or not) will be announced later
- no alternative medium tank branches will come in near patches
- trophy (captured) tanks will come in very far future
- Q: "Storm, in the recent ASAP videos you appear every time wearing the same sweater. Does it have anything to do with the gold shells for credits introduction?" A: "Definitely! 'We need more gold'(c) Our sales are not enough to buy a second sweater..."
- Storm states that the issue with Nvidia cards is not yet solved
- Leopard 1's shell ejector mechanism does not influence its camo factor
- T28 Prototype ingame was based on this sketch:
- there will be no free tanks in 0.8.6 (eg. if you have a tier 8 artillery, it will get moved to tier 10, but you will not get its new T8 replacement also). Its replacement however will be unlocked.
- Storm states there were no Löwe changes and calls a player saying Löwe was ninjanerfed a liar
- SerB and Storm on Löwe ninjanerf player claims: "If there was a poll 500 years ago about the shape of the Earth, the winning answer would be that it's flat" and "Many say there are UFO's, but have no proof, just like you don't."
- the total amount of experience needed to level up a tier 10 arty from tier 1 will be roughly the same as it currently costs to level up a tier 8 arty
- destroyable bushes (as an equivalent to trees that can be brought down) are not planned
- in time, small destructable objects (fences, shacks etc.) will allow AP and APCR shells to pass thru them
- according to Storm, Maus is unpopular because it's slow
- some "people with very high reputation" claim GW Elefant (new German arty) is a Wargaming fake. WG will "tell everything later"
- the minimum thickness for spaced armor plates to be implemented into WoT is 10mm, thinner armor plates won't be modelled
- apparently Storm is aware that the T-44 turret is unhistorical (wrong designation), doesn't consider it important ("what a horror...")
- British second TD branch will not come this year, nor will any other British TD vehicles be introduced
- according to devs, ammorack explosions of 7,92mm - 12,7mm shells are okay
- according to devs, there is no need to buff IS-7
- TD experience gain might be rebalanced (for them to get more XP from battles), "no comment so far"
- apparently the T-50-2 will not be removed from the game
- King Tiger maximum speed won't be buffed
- SS: now, this is something I don't understand fully, but apparently, there is a new CW mechanism/event in the making with provinces controlled by NPC's (sorry, no idea what this means)
- point limit change for various tier companies is not planned
- Hellcat won't recieve a 105mm howitzer ("We don't consider it necessery") (SS: but the 105mm Hellcat designated T88 is still planned for WoT)
- for now, new perks are not planned, but the whole perk mechanism will be reviewed, new ones might come eventually
- there might be a special "Sorry" quick command implemented
- special (in-battle) help for stuck tanks will not be implemented, as after the physics introduction such cases have become very rare
- devs won't implement a stat reset after 100-300 battles
- generally Storm considers the calling for old maps (pre-rework) to be brought back a nostalgia, people are lazy to learn new things
- there is no coefficient, that would award credits for damage done based on what shell was used
- new Nvidia drivers still have the bug, where the game says "Not enough experience" and crashes, when you open a techtree branch, the devs are trying to solve it
"- there will be no free tanks in 0.8.6 (eg. if you have a tier 8 artillery, it will get moved to tier 10, but you will not get its new T8 replacement also). Its replacement however will be unlocked."
ReplyDeleteWell, that's unlucky. I remember when USSR got second HT line, you could get few tanks for free. Not to mention US HT line changes and free T8 premium + new T9 HT for everyone who had T34 in their garage.
Actually, I understand not giving away T8 arties, when the current ones go up to T10.
DeleteHowever, what's going to happen to T4 and T6 arties(that people use in TCs)? Will they have to rebuy them, if they move tiers?
-imperiumgraecum-
cuz...its german line?
DeleteEternalFlame
Reminds me on the E50 /Panther 2 disaster. ;)
Deleteafter they changed the techtree we will no more get free tanks!
DeleteIf a T4 arty moves to T5 you'll keep it and have the T4 replacement researched. Shame about TC's, but that's life - at least you'll get more money from selling it
DeleteTbh, i think the last thing the game needs is even more arty on the server, and that's what would happen if they gave away the replacements. Good decision imo.
Delete> - apparently Storm is aware that the T-44 turret is unhistorical (wrong designation), doesn't consider it important ("what a horror...")
ReplyDeleteIt fixed already in 0.8.5 test.
does serB even GIVE real answer or just trolling posts that have no relation to reality?
DeleteTo get the right answer, you need to ask the right person, who knows the answer (and can fix something, as is the case with the names of the T-44). SerB and Storm - the producers, they know the answers to global issues, but do not know the fine details ("why the turret is called so?")
Delete- generally Storm considers the calling for old maps (pre-rework) to be brought back a nostalgia, people are lazy to learn new things.
ReplyDeleteFuck that idiot.
Komarin and Swamp were very good. Why the hell it was removed in first place only woman logic can understand.
Exactly much better than Dragon's Ridge and the other one (cant remember the name, Canada?), the more maps the better.
DeleteKomarin was awful. And 90% of players was saying like that, now everybody seems to forget all those campfests and whining about the map. Still, I hope that with the re-introduction the map will become better
DeleteWeird lad. Komarin was a terrible, terrible campfest and Swamp only marginally better (plus an arty shooting range). Far as I'm concerned those critters should be burned and the remnants buried at crossroads at midnight - and I wouldn't mind if Province and Highway were thrown into the same grave (for much the same reasons).
DeleteI don't get why people think that Kormina, Swamp and Dragon Ridge were bad. :|
DeleteNone of you are reading that right...
DeleteI'm 99% sure what he means is they updated maps and are not going to re-introduce the old versions of those maps. I don't think this has anything to do with Komarin or Swamp at all....
Kamperin usually turned into Der Sitzkrieg around the bridges and the middle, with the battle going for whoever had deeper reserves of patience and/or more competent arty.
DeleteSwamp was largely the same thing, except the chokepoints were primarily around the two villages - trying to cross the middle tended to be suicidal unless the other team were complete idiots.
Dragon Ridge is plain horrible for just about all the less-mobile vehicles (there's sort of a reason the Chinese themselves devised a whole family of "light battle tanks" to operate in that kind of geography), but I actually consider it a lesser evil than Highway which is kind of like old Swamp except with less arty cover and kinda imba for the NE team.
And don't get me started on Serene Coast...
FEAR AND LOATHING.
I think he is referring to the current maps in their previous incarnation. Komarin and Swamp are currently being reworked.
Deletehere is literally the only person who thought Komarin was actually good and not a map only good for artillery
Delete"- the minimum thickness for spaced armor plates to be implemented into WoT is 10mm, thinner armor plates won't be modelled"
ReplyDeleteWhat about the 6mm plates on centurion?
Incorrect translation.
DeleteOriginal:
"тонкие экраны стараемся не делать без особой необходимости."
Translation:
"- the minimum thickness for spaced armor plates to be implemented into WoT is 10mm, thinner armor plates won't be modelled"
"без особой необходимости" lost. (it is "unless absolutely necessary")
Thanks.
Delete"- King Tiger maximum speed won't be buffed"
ReplyDeleteIt is funny as few post higher they mention that turret of T-44 is unhistorical, because the designation is wrong. Ingame KT is 10 kp/h slower than real one, and yet there is nothing wrong, unhistorical with that.
"- generally Storm considers the calling for old maps (pre-rework) to be brought back a nostalgia, people are lazy to learn new things".
Another brilliant example of WG amazing PR skills...
Translation: "WE are lazy to learn how to re-work the map".
Delete> It is funny as few post higher they mention that turret of T-44 is unhistorical, because the designation is wrong.
DeleteIt is already fixed in 0.8.5 test.
The German documents were the only ones to say 38 km/h. All actual testing by both the US and Soviet Union showed that the top speed was much less.
DeletePlus, regardless of maximum top speed we still have the KT going at twice the speed of its cross-country capabilities. That's more of a buff than anything. Would you rather have a nominal higher speed without the engine to get to that speed?
It's like the T28. :/ Wrong model, but who cares at WG?
DeleteIt bothers me real hard so I got a remodel for it. :(
38 km/h was a theoretical max. speed. However, going above ~30km/h stressed transmission too much, and crews were instructed never to breach that limit unless absolutely necessary. Breakdowns were basically guaranteed otherwise, and then there was a problem of hauling 70 ton vehicle...So, WG made a right decision in this case.
Delete@Kankou
All vehicles use top rated (road) speed. Suits the fast paced style of game.
--
ActionMan
> It's like the T28. :/ Wrong model, but who cares at WG?
DeleteIt bothers me real hard so I got a remodel for it. :(
Which one T28 (T-28, T28, T28 Prototype, T95)? And what kind of "wrong model"?
T28 and T95 are the same thing. What we have ingame as T28 should look like T95, just without external pair of tracks, but yet ingame T28 has some kind of upper and lower frontal plate, where only gun mantles should be (like in T95). T28 Prot. in its current ingame state is a completely made up vehicle.
DeleteAnd about Tiger II. I don't have access to any more sophisticated sources, but Wikipedia (en, ru and pl) states that 35-38 kph was maximum sustainable speed, and 41,5 was maximum achieveable speed, that might have caused serious damage to the tank.
Delete/\ this T28/95 I mean. I tried to make it clear with naming it T28 and not T-28 or T28 proto. Next time "anon" use a name if you quote someone, please. :)
DeleteThe Battlefield.ru site claims that the Tiger II couldn't reach speeds about 30 km/h top speed.
Deletehttp://english.battlefield.ru/was-the-tiger-really-king.html
American field tests show top speed around 20 mph(~30 km/h).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_w6PkViRnCQ
"- British second TD branch will not come this year, nor will any other British TD vehicles be introduced"
ReplyDeleteSo, does the second part mean that no British TDs will be introduced this year, or no more British TDs ever?
The first
DeleteSo no 17pdr Achilles then, sigh...
Delete"- apparently the T-50-2 will not be removed from the game"
ReplyDeleteSo what are they going to do with it? It's my favorite tank and I already accepted it's going to be gone soon, and now I read this :)
FoxWMB, EU Server
Havent they already confirmed that this tank is gonna be replaced with something else?
DeleteMaybe do the same as with the german light tanks (moving it up tiers/nerfing it) or it wil be replaced and become a premium.
Deleteyup they had confirmed but it seems they changed their minds...
DeleteQQ I wanted to see the MT-25 Mototank.
DeleteIt's possible MT-25 will replace T-50-2 and T-50-2 gets kicked up to tier 6, or vice versa
Delete>It's possible MT-25 will replace T-50-2 and T-50-2 gets kicked up to tier 6, or vice versa
DeleteThats hard to believe, the whole reason the T-50-2 was being replaced, was because it wasn't historical at all; the IRL prototype would've been much slower, and hard to manoeuvre.
This was said by SerB in a 'ASAP', on T-50-2 removal. 4min:17sec
WG, fucking clowns as usual. If they ever looked at statistics from anywhere else than the RU server... but no, better to be useless trolling pieces of smelly shit.
ReplyDeleteQQ
Delete@up FU
Delete> If they ever looked at statistics from anywhere else than the RU server...
DeleteYes, they look at EU and COM every patch (same as RU).
- game balance (tank winrates) is analysed after every patch
ReplyDeleteWhich is useless anyway because of population bias (some tanks have more or less skilled players on average, that's a fact) and popularity normalising a tank's WR.
-Platypusbill
And your suggestion for a better metric to work by would be...?
DeleteNo such thing as a metric. Just use common sense (e.g. a tank can't have high pen and be crap in pretty much everything else, à la Churchill GC).
Delete-Platypusbill
...I think I'll excuse them for sticking to proper statistics in order to monitor how stuff actually works out, thanks.
DeleteHave you noticed that- both now and historically- many extremely powerful tanks are/have been average to bad in terms of their global WR?
DeleteFor instance, the T-62A- extremely popular in Russia, so it's the first tier X for a lot of players (read: it has statistically more newbs than most tier Xs) so it underperforms compared to just how good it is. And some tanks aren't noob friendly enough to let most players make use of their potential.
Same story with the old KV, T-54 prior to being meganerfed, etc.
-Platypusbill
OH than thats the reason why so many noobs on the eu server cry about UP german tanks... its not the tanks just to many noobs playing them ...
DeleteWell they DO attract the xXxWitmann_Super_KillaxXx brand of idiot like nothing else AFAIK... BTW may I add that every Ger tank I've played for any amount of time, including the supposedly terribad "Dragonball", has turned out to be a right fine ride? :P
DeleteThere is a distinction between the average "buff Germans" people and the Wehraboos- the latter seems to be offended by invincible teutonic engineering masterpieces not being flat out better than their counterparts. German tanks that actually need buffs/reworks include the Pz IV (after the gold derps get nerfhammered, ofc), Tiger, Panther, Maus, JgPz IV, and some others. -Platypusbill
DeleteI believe the T-50-2 part is translated badly.
ReplyDelete"people are lazy to learn new things" ... okay, i´m ready to learn new maps...so gimme some!
ReplyDeleteThe German documents were the only ones to say 38 km/h. All actual testing by both the US and Soviet Union showed that the top speed was much less.
ReplyDeletePlus, regardless of maximum top speed we still have the KT going at twice the speed of its cross-country capabilities. That's more of a buff than anything. Would you rather have a nominal higher speed without the engine to get to that speed?
You should look what engine had King Tiger in WWII, and what engine have in game. IF you wont to be so true to history, WHY all Soviet tank goes cross-country that fast? They buff Soviet tanks, like IS-3 (turret buff)when history is for their lovers, but rest of tanks, could be shit. IS 7 could have better speed on 8.5 ? why King Tiger dont need? tell me!!?
QQ
Deleteever heard about balance?
(Nope, balance is not when UR tanks are OP)
So, it's ok to make USSR tanks OP, and buff them, for the sake of historical accuracy, while Germans are nerfed because of "balance" (yeah, like they were OP...), and when we ask for historical buffs (Tiger H should also have a higher speed), we get idiotic trolling/answers I generally hear from 10 year olds.
DeleteIf I look through the Soviet tree, there are so many historically innacurate tanks, like the T-50-2, whose RL maneouvreability was nothing like what we have ingame.
I can't wait for WT to get tanks, they'll surely take away half of WoT's player base. Why? They don't make up fake stats/tanks, they listen to player suggestions, the bias is n't as much as in WoT, and things there are actually historical.
In what universe is the IS-7 OP?
DeleteAlso the T-50-2 nowadays only narrowly beats the Leopard in traverse (and loses hands down to the Chaffee and VK28) so, like, *whatever*. And AFAIK the devs are unhappy with the model and have been looking for a suitable replacement for a while now.
DeleteWell, Soviet tanks cant maneuver for sh*t on bad terrain. IS-7 on swampy ground... dear god its a T95...
DeleteOnly exception is T-62A I think.
T-62A is practically a hovercraft, IS-7 apparently has superglue smeared all over the tracks.
DeleteBut the ´7 is really the only Soviet tank that has artificially bad terrain modifiers.
-Platypusbill
T-50-2 loses hands down to the Chaffee and VK28
Deleteloool you stupid fck, have you heard they nerfed the shit out of vk2801 recently? Because they did, and it sucks big time now (got one, 250 battles, 64% win ratio with no platoons) And Chaffee is next when the rest of US lights arrive.
Henriques (EU)
.__.
DeleteYour standards for "big-time suck" are pretty interesting. Deviant, even.
yet again, WG are unwilling or unable to implement anything new except new paper tanks...
ReplyDeletepeople start to think, hey why am i playing this shitty game anyway....
*quote* trophy (captured) tanks will come in very far future
in the var future i don't see WoT, maybe War-Thunder but unlikely WoT.
I recall a while back that Gaijin is planning their own version of WoT to go with War Thunder. If that's true, it'll be interesting to see how it turns out.
DeleteIt's a fact they are. If you played War Thunder you would see the tabs for "Air/Land/Sea". War Thunder is a superior product to WoWP in every way. I can only hope their Land and Sea are similar in superiority. It would put WG in a panic to get off their lazy asses and fucking do something.
DeleteWell if they add more iconic tanks like the Sherman Firefly before WG does, then I'm getting rid of WoT for good. ATM, WoWP have far less aircraft than War Thunder. But it's still in closed beta, so I'm going to give them time to catch up.
DeleteWarThunder has epic pay2win. Like respawn for gold players etc.
DeleteAlso get used to be oneshoted.
Seen plenty of one shots in WoT too, so it'll be no surprise to me.
Delete"Also get used to be oneshoted." Being onshoted is realistic, in fact, If a tank gets hit once (penetrated) by a significantly powerful gun, it will catch fire and burn to death, wot wound be much better if all tanks had less hp and there was no gold shells, either you bounce or you die or get badly crippled (one or two crew dead and a few modules too). I would like to play that game.
DeleteFor the airplanes, the actually survive better, because the guns used have less caliber, so you actuality have to hit a weakspot or hit several times to destroy something.
Henriques (EU)
...except when the autocannons turn up and blow chunks off your plane with a few hits. Which pretty much everybody except the Yanks used with varying degrees of gusto (and even the they produced the Aircobra).
Delete>according to Storm, Maus is unpopular because it's slow
ReplyDeletehahah oh god that's a good one. BECAUSE IT'S SLOW OH YES ofc same with KV-1 yes? or T150? or other russian monsters swarming lower tiers? maybe if it had some good armor then it would be popular, you fucking morons. seriously i can't believe how can someone be THIS fucking stupid.
It's still the best-armoured T10, genius. Rather undergunned however and the pitiful maneuverability doesn't help one bit (not to mention making it an excellent arty target).
DeleteA decently handled Churchill III *will* kill a KV-1 up close (though it'll be on the brink of death afterwards) and the T-150 isn't actually all that much better off given that it can run into up to Tier 8 opponents (been there, was actually useful for the team), plus both have the agility of an ingot of pig iron - but they pack competitive guns for their tiers so they get by.
Not so the Mouse.
The Maus is unpopular because WG made gold ammo available to everyone thus defeating it's only virtue AND made the tank even more horrible with the physics patch. It's is garbage now, just a distraction, used as a barely mobile road block to be parked where they want it blown up to slow down the enemy team. It's the same concept of scuttling a bridge.
DeleteBecause it wouldn't be quite vulnerable to any number of high-tier guns even without their users going gold amirite?
DeleteBeing able to fight back effectively wouldn't exactly hurt methinks - certainly seems to work for the E-100.
The T-150 is NOT slow. Your comparison is pointless and invalid.
DeleteCompared to what - a beached whale?
DeleteCompared to the M4A3E2, KV-3, or hell even the IS.
DeleteFor something that's supposed to be a heavily armored slug the T-150 moves exceptionally well.
Even if it was really slow the guy's point would still be crap. The T-150 isn't even that common of a tier 6 tank. For that matter the tanks in the IS-4 line in general don't seem that popular.
I either have or used to have all the tanks listed, and allow me to ask you to stop bullshitting me because the only one of the lot with poorer mobility is the KV-3 - I've nicknamed mine the "Ural Steel Block" - which is kind of a given when you look at the weight diff.
DeleteThe T-150 can reach fairly decent speeds (in practice ~30km/h) on long, straight and level but good Lord nobody's going to confuse it with *nimble* as the thing turns like a truck.
Not seeing how the popularity or lack thereof of that branch is relevant here, the point was that "cumbersome turtle" works fairly well so long it has 'nuff gun to actually return fire when people start pounding on it. Noted that with the T28 Proto too once I got the second gun on it.
This poster is a retard...
DeleteThere's a difference between "Maus slow" and "Heavy tank" slow.
" - TD experience gain might be rebalanced (for them to get more XP from battles), "no comment so far" "
ReplyDeleteThat would be cool! I think TDs gain too less XP.
I HAVE PROOF OF ONE THING serb, THE KV1S, TIER 6, IS A BETTER TANK THEN THE PANTHER, TIER 7.
ReplyDeleteTHE MOST ADVANCED MEDIUM IN THE WORLD AT THE TIME.
OUR PANTHER IS A JOKE. YOU WANT TO OWN CLAN WARS, FINE, BUT GIVE TIER 7 AND 9.
MAKE THE PANTHER AND PROTOTYPE MORE REALISTIC TANKS.
YOU MAKE US DRIVE AROUND IN THAT RIDICULOUS PHUCKIN NEEDLE GUN, WHNE YOU SHOULD JUST GIVE US 175, PEN, 150 DAMAGE ON HISTORICAL GUN.
GOLD ROUND, 200/200. THAT WOULD SELL SOME TICKETS.
YOU ARE NO ONE TO CALL ANYONE A LIAR, STALINIST POS.
YOU KILLED MORE OF YOUR OWN PEOPLE THEN HITLER DID.
I CANT WAIT TILL YOU GET FIRED.
FYI allcaps in fact *isn't* the cruise control for cool. The Internet lies to you ALL THE TIME.
DeleteAlso how is a chronically unreliable, over-large and under-gunned bugger with a certain propensity for *setting its own engine on fire* "the most advanced medium in the world"? It just had a decent gun and solid frontal armour, and both could've been put in a rather more compact and reliable package.
Oh my God L2P
DeleteArt thou mad, Brother?
Deleteaaand that is what they in WG call 'nemtesfily'
Delete/strv
Typicall german cry kid:
Delete1. Say something about a proof for some stupid thing but never deliver it
2. Say something about russian bias or UP german tank
3. Insult devs
4. Talk about realism in an arcade game and how german tanks were the best ever made tanks ever
5. some more insults
6. talking some unimportant shit about how the one mass murder is better than the other one.
7. Write everything in caps so u will be taken 100% serious.
LoL, the maus is unpopular because its slow........, lol. Everyone expects it to be slow Serb, duh, its a Maus. We dont like it because you have it catch fire, it has no penn, most armor in the game and it takes the second most module damage. No turret options, no gun options....
ReplyDeleteyea, we dont like it cause its slow. God, are all you related?
WE KNOW ITS SLOW, ASSHOLE.
Oh course it has no turret or gun options it's a tier 10
DeleteStorm =/= SerB
Deletegenius.jpg
German cry kids .. working as intended
DeleteHe has a point, but brought it wrong.
DeleteBefore the gold ammo change the Maus was godlike played well (in randoms). People often couldnt penetrate it from the sides.
Now many just unload gold into it, if needed.
If I ever met these two developers in real life, I think I would actually beat the shit out of them. Seriously. Their attitudes are fucking awful how they treat their user base. Can't wait until they have to start sucking player's dicks when War Thunder releases their Sea and Land combat to stay. It'll be a good warm up for when they're unemployed and sucking dick on street corners in mis-matched wind breaker jump suits.
ReplyDeleteAre you a repeat customer of such people? Sure seem to be familiar with the profession, and you kinda sound like one of those really annoying guys who feels the world owes it to him to make him feel all important and shit... :V
DeletePersonally I kinda like their "screw you too" attitude, it's a nice change of pace from the usual vapid ass-kissing that customer service and public relations has mostly devolved nowadays. Might be different if I had to deal with that kind of service culture in daily life but I don't so.
(Oh, and Internet Tough Guy alert - run for the hills!)
@TheVoiceOfReason...hahhahahahahahahhhahaha ! The most UN-reasonable attitude. Like your irony.
Delete(You were being ironic rather than being an actual crazed teen who's locked in a trailer because you missed your prescribed methadone shot, right?)
TheVoiceOfNerdRage.
DeleteSay that to my FACE fucker not online and see what happens -SerB
Delete- the total amount of experience needed to level up a tier 10 arty from tier 1 will be roughly the same as it currently costs to level up a tier 8 arty
ReplyDeleteNo fucking wonder T10 is filled with T8 arties. What kind of drunk shithead made that decision regarding the same XP required for arties?....
"- SS: now, this is something I don't understand fully, but apparently, there is a new CW mechanism/event in the making with provinces controlled by NPC's (sorry, no idea what this means)"
ReplyDelete[NPC] is the "clan" that controls the provinces of a newly added region on the CW map. This has happened when they introduced West Africa on the EU server.
So, what does that mean then? New clanwars provinces?
DeleteEither that or they are introducing bot tanks/defences to fight against.
DeleteAenaes.
I'm guessing that its a rebellion system in which a province will rebel and be controlled by nobody
DeleteThe russian server just received another american region. As seen here: http://worldoftanks.ru/clanwars/maps/?province=AN_43
Delete- the total amount of experience needed to level up a tier 10 arty from tier 1 will be roughly the same as it currently costs to level up a tier 8 arty
ReplyDeletenot if you already came up to tier VII : troll :
- in time, small destructable objects (fences, shacks etc.) will allow AP and APCR shells to pass thru them
fantastic! I always got bored when I think about how someone survived while hiding behind a thing little brick wall..
- there might be a special "Sorry" quick command implemented
give some trolls more things to troll with
Uh thats funny, your calling us lazy, but you wont give us new maps. Plz put the old maps back in the low tiers.
ReplyDelete- there will be no free tanks in 0.8.6 (eg. if you have a tier 8 artillery, it will get moved to tier 10, but you will not get its new T8 replacement also). Its replacement however will be unlocked.
ReplyDeleteOK, Just so I get this straight. With 8.6 we will have:
1. Tier 8 Arty goes to Tier 10.
2. Replacement at Tier 8 is unlocked, but not replaced.
3. The new Tier 9 Arty will have to be ground out and researched.
My Question is can we start grinding the EXP now on our Tier 8 Arty and will it remain at Tier 8 when the patch hits?
I would like to get a head start.
By the way, I think you are going to see a shitload of Tier 8 Arty until 8.6 hits. Just in case.
I know I will be....
nvidia bug still existing is inexcusable!
ReplyDeletethe majority of players have nvidia cards and the tech tree/crash to desktop bug is MONTHS old!
FIX IT!!!!
this SerB ... what an asshole
ReplyDelete