Pages

Apr 11, 2013

11.4.2013

- the third T-80 crewmember was historically the gunner
- the old tracer system (where you could see tracers even from undiscovered enemies) will not return
- devs have enough ideas for game optimalisation for several years of implementation
- all arties will be completely rebalanced up to the point of implementing new guns
- official WG "noobmeter" is planned for very distant future (SS: if I understood this correctly, it's somewhat unclear, since a part of the original question is missing)
- single-click crew transfer from tank to tank (premium to regular and back for example) is planned
- devs consider KV-1S balanced and alright
- Object 261 (based on IS-7 hull) maximum speed won't be increased
- you can spend only 3 battles in a row at the bottom of your team, the 4th battle the MM forces you to be on the top or in the middle of your team
- in the future, accidentally sold crews will be possible to restore, for now, it's not possible even thru tech support
- the rules for teamkill/teamdamage punishments will be changed (intentionally not said how), devs are working on it right now. Current system does take recidivism (previous bans) in account when selecting proper punishment. The changes in rules (and possibly to whole mechanism) ETA is not yet decided
- the cancelled tech tree transfers (Hummel - Pz III/IV etc.) were not included in the patchnotes because Storm forgot about them
- Storm states that it's useless to angle the Löwe, it has a weak hull for its tier - you gotta take shells with the turret
- it's possible the "average damage per battle" stat will be implemented into the player's official profile
- new "mechanics explanation" movie (SS: I believe in English the series was called Interesting mechanics or something like that?) will come relatively soon
- SerB states that the problem with implementing the T-62A was that some its stats were too good while others sucked, the tank was also considered "too new", but SerB is happy with how it turned out
- the maximum gun elevation angle in game is 45 degress, that's when the arty shell flies the longest distance. For example if the arty stands on the 30 degrees slope, that angle would be 15 degrees
- devs do not watch player-made bug movies on youtube
- for arty vehicles using 2-part shells (shell + charge separately) it was considered to allow them to use reduced charge fill so the shell would fly with more curved trajectories. The idea was however scrapped.
- there was no "1941 pattern T-44", there was only the A-44 project (SS: regarding Soviet medium tanks, players are trying to post suggestions for various alternative Soviet types)
- Object 430 will not be implemented as tier 8 Soviet vehicle (SerB: "Share the marihuana joint") (SS: Object 430 was a late 50's medium tank project, designed to improve/replace the T-54. While it was not a bad vehicle, its performance was not much better than that of T-54 and the project was scrapped. It would make a fine T10 I think).

41 comments:

  1. So, there's no ETA for either second soviet medium branch or the premium med yet? And there's going to be third soviet medium branch (regarding the yesterday's news)?

    Btw. Your capcha is irritating

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank the Russians, a while back a bunch of faggots from Russian forums came here to spam.

      Delete
    2. You're gonna have the "gay-rage gay rage" again, this time for "faggots" :D

      Delete
  2. -single-click crew transfer from tank to tank (premium to regular and back for example) is planned
    yes!!!!
    - Storm states that it's useless to angle the Löwe, it has a weak hull for its tier - you gotta take shells with the turret
    that is true the other day i hulldown my lowe and worked better than expected

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Always thought lowe should have 8-9 matchmaking anyways.

      Delete
  3. Looking at the link, I'm curious as to why they used the T-62A instead of the Object 430. Maybe it was too good? Same gun but with better armor and better top speed.

    ReplyDelete
  4. 45 degrees is not necessarily the best angle for long range shooting:
    http://www.physics.rutgers.edu/~zapolsky/381/aim.pdf explains this pretty well.
    -Vollketten

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No drag in game for ballistic trajectory purposes -Xlucine

      Delete
  5. - you can spend only 3 battles in a row at the bottom of your team, the 4th battle the MM forces you to be on the top or in the middle of your team
    And vice-versa? How many battles a tank can be top tier (longest run)?prolly the same...

    - the maximum gun elevation angle in game is 45 degress, that's when the arty shell flies the longest distance. For example if the arty stands on the 30 degrees slope, that angle would be 15 degrees
    Seen on yt a guy in s-51 on slope firing 90 degrees shot and killing himself lol

    - the cancelled tech tree transfers (Hummel - Pz III/IV etc.) were not included in the patchnotes because Storm forgot about them
    Perhaps a bit of extra info on this ,Silent?

    Steiner011

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. They'll be in the final patchnotes. If they aren't, I'll make a post.

      Delete
  6. "- official WG "noobmeter" is planned for very distant future"
    :: a historical performance measuring?

    "- devs consider KV-1S balanced and alright"
    :: Hahaha...

    "- it's possible the "average damage per battle" stat will be implemented into the player's official profile"
    :: Is it not atm?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Player's official profile shows average XP and average XP for each vehicle

      Delete
    2. Avg damage per battle by vehicle appears to be the best predictor of skill for medium tank and heavy tanks.

      Delete
  7. - the maximum gun elevation angle in game is 45 degress, that's when the arty shell flies the longest distance. For example if the arty stands on the 30 degrees slope, that angle would be 15 degrees

    http://i.imgur.com/wF7LNBY.jpg

    Really?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. So parking an SPG on a slope to get more elevation and more vertical plunging fire does no good at all as the game engine limits it.

      Gasp.

      Herman bla bla german

      (devs consider KV-1S balanced and alright) so do I.

      Delete
    2. When "normally" aiming, not when you aim at the sky when tank is sloped downwards to maximize elevation

      Delete
    3. That is actually most probably meant about firing angle. If you drive in arty and aim (in arty mode) at the farthest point your gun range can hit and you are on leveled ground (flat with no angle or bump) your gun will be at 45 degree angle. if you will drive upwards a hill that is in 30 degree angle from normal ground and you will aim in direction upwards the hill, and again at the farthest point you can hit with arty (while aiming in arty mode), your gun will be in 15 degree angle from the vehicle chassis.

      Delete
  8. I guess that no changes to the Leopard-1 from the 8.5 to the 8.5v1 test server is a good thing. I would hate for them to test nerf the tank.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Correction- 8.5v1 to 8.5v2 test server

      Delete
    2. Well, they said that the tank characteristics that were changed between the test server sessions will appear on the final patch-notes, so you don't know if they did something to the leo.Anyway, I'll give a try tomorrow on test server to see if they 'improved' anything.

      Delete
  9. BTW little OT:
    what do you guys think,will VK3002DB be more expensive after 8.5?
    after shell-shocked, i dont expect to see that kind of info in patchnotes,so is it better to buy DB now or later?

    Steiner011

    ReplyDelete
  10. "- devs consider KV-1S balanced and alright"

    Just goes to show how bad the overall understanding of their game is.
    They just look at the winrate and go "well thats balanced" , maybe playing their game would help them, but i guess they are to busy beeing arrogant/troll to towards their players

    Gloris

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. bro kv-1s isn't OP at all. But if u fight it always in dogfight or peek a boo well, that's ur problem.

      Delete
    2. KV-1S is blind, has crap hull armor, takes ages to aim and reload and gun is quite inaccurate.
      Play vs those weaknesses, not vs strengths (alpha and penetration) and you will win even with tier 5 meds more often then not.

      Delete
    3. KV-1s might be the Emperor of Ensk or Himmelsdorf, but Hellcat is THE Almighty God on Malinovka, El-Halluf and Muravanka with his camouflage, visibility, aimtime, dpm, speed, acceleration. Do u see the difference?

      Delete
    4. Guys its impossible that the player is the problem... frist comes russian bias, goldammo, rng , aliens, nazis, lags, cheats, haks, op tanks...

      Delete
    5. The oneshot tier 5s? That bounces on its "crap" hull armor? Against blind and aimless killer gun at a corner?
      How?

      Delete
    6. Poor KV-1S really needs the BL-10 to have any chance against those evil OP tier V tanks...

      Delete
    7. You only bounce on the hull if you autoaim or are an idiot. Don't shoot the sloped part.

      Delete
    8. "Don't shoot the sloped part"
      Please bro, it's either you engage it at a distance, in which case your RNG will determine where you hit, or you get up close with some other tanks and have one or two of them die for you to plink it to death. There's a reason why this tank is infesting TCs. A gun that can take out almost all the health of tier 5 tanks (all of it if you're a TD), and half the health of its respective tier 6s is just absurd.

      All this, coupled with the mobility of a medium tank even though it's a HEAVY TANK is just incompetence on WGs part. Or rather, not even incompetence because maybe they wanted it to be like that hm? Of course I can't even mention such things because people like you will shout WEHRABOO or GET GUD SKRUB.

      Delete
    9. Do you rage vs Hellcat also or vs T30 or vs T95?

      Delete
    10. Well.. with some tier 5's that have DPM like tier X, I am glad that KV-1S can one-shot them.

      Although, as for the tank itself.. maybe they should just reduce its speed when the top gun is mounted. It is just quite agile even when loaded with full gear.. D:

      Delete
  11. "Storm states that it's useless to angle the Löwe, it has a weak hull for its tier - you gotta take shells with the turret"

    Erm...I don't agree - it helps to bounce guns with up to 200 mm PEN (with some luck), however the mantlet can deflect a lot of shells :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Doubt storm has ever used a Lowe then. I learned how to angle using the Lowe and it is far from useless.

      Delete
  12. Object 430 would be way too powerful for tier 8. But are there plans to implement it in the game at all?

    ReplyDelete
  13. - devs do not watch player-made bug movies on youtube.

    That explains alot of things. Such as countless JT videos showing bugged mantlet, taking fire after fire when shot in weird areas, etc. That's just on example.

    - devs have enough ideas for game optimalisation for several years of implementation

    Dude...it's optimizations.

    - all arties will be completely rebalanced up to the point of implementing new guns

    +11111111111111111111111111111111111111

    ReplyDelete
  14. "the cancelled tech tree transfers (Hummel - Pz III/IV etc.) were not included in the patchnotes because Storm forgot about them"

    thats so sweet - he just forgot...
    i wonder how many times have they "forgot" about changing something ingame

    ReplyDelete
  15. russian expecially :D

    ReplyDelete
  16. - the old tracer system (where you could see tracers even from undiscovered enemies) will not return

    Wait, does that mean no more arty counter? At least for watching arty tracers...

    ReplyDelete
  17. "- devs consider KV-1S balanced and alright"
    So they are still repeating their old BS. Typical.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.