tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post3961650881696877643..comments2023-11-05T11:52:06.343+01:00Comments on For the Record: "Buff my tank!" - E-100SilentstalkerFTRhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03345351411597408992noreply@blogger.comBlogger47125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-38172253230256018672013-09-22T07:35:33.058+02:002013-09-22T07:35:33.058+02:00I can do the same on my KV-2 actually
I can do the same on my KV-2 actually<br />ignafiltrohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18171592771347384477noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-89606815319683322752013-04-05T11:23:22.561+02:002013-04-05T11:23:22.561+02:00Just move the E-100 down a Tier (nerf it a little ...Just move the E-100 down a Tier (nerf it a little first) or remove it from the tree (put it somewhere else) and replace it with an E-75 Ausf. M, equipped with the Jagtiger's 12.8cm L/61 gun (nerfed for balance).<br /><br />For those of you saying that the E-75M never existed, just remember that the E-50M never existed either, not even in blueprints (both the E-50 and E-75 were in blueprints).Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-56159485222355852822013-04-04T14:39:22.947+02:002013-04-04T14:39:22.947+02:00Artillery should shoot more frequently doing far l...Artillery should shoot more frequently doing far less damage and have larger splash, harassing fire not instant kill. Any game that takes a minute to load into a battle where you can't re-spawn should not have one-shot kill weapons.Xelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12986606428193670901noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-90733306503640144032013-04-04T13:56:46.141+02:002013-04-04T13:56:46.141+02:00amen amen Odeseyushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12454593264228159769noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-42850045442621034572013-04-04T11:27:42.658+02:002013-04-04T11:27:42.658+02:00Yeah.. I love that too.
With the stock gun of my R...Yeah.. I love that too.<br />With the stock gun of my Russian Tier 7 tank destroyer.<br /><br />http://mwreplays.com/replay/E8GQOHJ5QE1V/<br /><br />I feel kinda cheated when I have to beg for hits like that in my T10 heavy tank.<br />E-100 is a poor joke right now.madmatonenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-43784020560573964162013-04-04T09:42:57.499+02:002013-04-04T09:42:57.499+02:00Uhh, no.
It specifically talks about Assault guns ...Uhh, no.<br />It specifically talks about Assault guns on Maus and E-100 chassis when mentioning the larger guns so it's all about casemates, not turret.Zaraxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01584728235999957920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-49524601624903265462013-04-04T08:37:28.707+02:002013-04-04T08:37:28.707+02:00The remove arty solution is as good as the remove ...The remove arty solution is as good as the remove the E-100 solution imho.DasNiveauhttp://www.sovietrussia.runoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-54121156808013023832013-04-04T01:50:51.547+02:002013-04-04T01:50:51.547+02:00I like my E-100 just fine, the only sad part is th...I like my E-100 just fine, the only sad part is that the 128 isn't really an option; it simply isn't accurate enough to bother with.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-32003478087697743122013-04-04T01:41:26.348+02:002013-04-04T01:41:26.348+02:00I believe that was just a typo, and the original s...I believe that was just a typo, and the original statement was "would not(never) have faced".Jahrainnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-68172551055841337562013-04-04T01:12:07.816+02:002013-04-04T01:12:07.816+02:00Uh, turret ring diameters were always a pretty big...Uh, turret ring diameters were always a pretty big constraint in tank design (or more specifically gun choice) you know. Something to do with recoil absorption and suchlike I understand - an sich you could always modify the turret design itself if mere volume was needed (within reason), after all.<br /><br />The thing with enlarging the 'ring is AFAIK that you pretty much need to widen the hull to do it - and I doubt I need to explain the implications in the context of an already super-large vehicle as in this case.Kellomiesnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-78202179791551762472013-04-04T01:02:50.125+02:002013-04-04T01:02:50.125+02:00funny, because in 0.8.0 I actually got some quite ...funny, because in 0.8.0 I actually got some quite nice stats soloing and brawling the enemy to death<br />didnt need any gold and gold actually made it harder to play, because its turret became once again a huge weakspotmorgotzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03975866516518288204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-79670166443612633452013-04-04T00:23:02.012+02:002013-04-04T00:23:02.012+02:00I can think of 2 things:
1. There was a lot of ta...I can think of 2 things: <br />1. There was a lot of talk about the E-100 lower plate being at 52 degrees, not 50. Any small improvement is welcome.<br />2. Buff engine anyway, as its the Ausf.B version of the engine, yet identical to the Ausf.A 100 more horse power would be good.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02606342673358725597noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-10316841485375236092013-04-03T23:50:36.431+02:002013-04-03T23:50:36.431+02:00@Brice - you're talking about turret rings, I&...@Brice - you're talking about turret rings, I'm talking about turret accommodating space in cubic feet. You're talking greek, I'm talking Italian. A ring goes into the floor of the turret, fine, I get that, the remainder of the turret's work-space... this is the issue I'm mentioning. WG has done a pretty bizarre job of making up stuff along with rumors and bits and pieces, and this wouldn't be any different. Nowhere does it say "the gun will not fit in the turret" ... nowhere. The Ring is a resolvable issue that's easily remedied with an Ausf. B marque or an asterisk next to the name to denote a modified version. It's not like this'll ever even happen anyway, but to try to downplay it is foolish.<br /><br />@ fattoler : Basically you'd end up with what Trumpter I believe made a model for which can be seen here : http://wotarmory.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/e-100-model.jpg<br />SeanPwnerynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-86503179877232374072013-04-03T23:47:19.593+02:002013-04-03T23:47:19.593+02:00Exactly...f.x. u r facing an IS7 at mid range with...Exactly...f.x. u r facing an IS7 at mid range with 500 HP<br /><br />U can bounce an AP and scream "Buff e100, f**ing WG"<br />or just use your howitzer and shot him with HE.<br /><br />Also there is no need for Gold on T9's.<br /><br />Or u can go for Max DMG of 950 (+25% 1180DMG) = with HE if u penetrate (Jagdtiger side f.x.)<br /><br />dont blame the Tank, read the guide and watch some of his replays..its amazing<br /><br />anon1 Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-31310049516043282022013-04-03T23:30:17.942+02:002013-04-03T23:30:17.942+02:00Wouldn't an E-100 with an E-75 turret look lik...Wouldn't an E-100 with an E-75 turret look like one of those body-builders with a tiny head? XDfattolerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02315995076317496087noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-72178864795372559292013-04-03T23:22:47.872+02:002013-04-03T23:22:47.872+02:00just give it a modified JT gun and see how it perf...just give it a modified JT gun and see how it performsOdeseyushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12454593264228159769noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-86687280969264782812013-04-03T23:08:27.070+02:002013-04-03T23:08:27.070+02:00Well.. he said - right ammo type, in the right tim...Well.. he said - right ammo type, in the right time.<br /><br />By the way you don't need to aim so carefully with HE, just autoaim and boom. (to kill low HP tanks, or hit targets far away)Stieger11noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-85882937414740737482013-04-03T23:02:21.529+02:002013-04-03T23:02:21.529+02:00Příště se prosímtě podepiš a zkus to spíš anglicky...Příště se prosímtě podepiš a zkus to spíš anglicky.<br /><br />Basically, this player suggests E-100 should be made (unhistorically) lighter, lighter Adlerturm should be added with a 128mm gun from the Jagdtiger, reduce the tank weight (reduce armor) and set the maximum speed to 40 km/h. He also suggets better zoom for tanks (because they had superior optics), better radio range) in order to make it a durable sniper.SilentstalkerFTRhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03345351411597408992noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-76248693102221332322013-04-03T22:58:01.523+02:002013-04-03T22:58:01.523+02:00The hull was shortened and slightly widened betwee...The hull was shortened and slightly widened between the first 170 ton draft and the final 130 ton one, not to mention the design was changed from rear to center turret.<br /><br />On page 54 it says that rear transmission required moving the engine forward and changing the hull layout...<br /><br />One could almost see *troll* an E-100 ausf M!Zaraxhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01584728235999957920noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-41135171341803989432013-04-03T22:50:48.042+02:002013-04-03T22:50:48.042+02:00The German Wiki says the E-100 turm is too small f...The German Wiki says the E-100 turm is too small for the 17 cm gun, you can also read the information in the picture Zarax posted and you'll see the Maus II turm(E-100 turm) was to have a larger turret ring than the regular Mausturm. Put two and two together and you get it doesn't fit. <br /><br />Another piece of evidence is that the 15 cm L/68 takes up the whole turret if you overlay it, now imagine overlaying a 17 cm gun that would likely take up more space than the 15 cm L/68 gun would.<br /><br />I'd like to keep with the tank Germany designed, not the one you pulled out of thin air.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00707985834690968512noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-7853126199983090652013-04-03T22:50:14.004+02:002013-04-03T22:50:14.004+02:00So we will fire HE with even less dmg than IS-7 gi...So we will fire HE with even less dmg than IS-7 give u by AP shell and still we will reload it much slower than IS-7? Realy master mind can come with something like that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-4595932476421163832013-04-03T22:30:56.851+02:002013-04-03T22:30:56.851+02:00In addition, about the E-75 turret, we're not ...In addition, about the E-75 turret, we're not doing *anything* against history because if you really want to split hairs, the E-100's turret was never completed and a Mausturm would have been used until one could be finished/fitted.<br /><br />Having an E-75 turret or a beefed up version of one housing a smaller caliber but more accurate gun would allow for faster rotation, a lighter tank, and a smaller cross-sectional target when facing it head on - all advantages there.SeanPwnerynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-78544027845375406142013-04-03T22:28:13.093+02:002013-04-03T22:28:13.093+02:00You can *say* all these things, but there's no...You can *say* all these things, but there's no proof of any of these things. I'll agree the elevation and depression would be an issue, but other than that, we're talking about vehicle heights on the maus chassis first. The Maus turret is physically longer front to back, which means there's more internal workspace unless it's grossly narrower than the current turret (doubtful). <br /><br />The biggest issue here as you pointed out was reloading or in this case, shell capacity. I'm more than happy to concede the breech would be larger and would recoil farther back into the turret, and compared to the moderately sized 150, shell count would be far less, but take a good look at the Fv215 183, and tell me about the gun not fitting, or the ammo it can or cannot carry.<br /><br />Give me an E-100 with Mausturm and the Kanone 18 and maybe 18 shells and I'd be a pretty happy tanker.SeanPwnerynoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-60125556778401095012013-04-03T22:18:43.113+02:002013-04-03T22:18:43.113+02:00The 17 cm wouldn't fit inside the turret ring ...The 17 cm wouldn't fit inside the turret ring at all, it would be impossible to load and would have no depression or elevation. Also it is completely historically inaccurate for the Maus/E-100 turm to mount such a gun. The E-75-style turret is also a slap in the face to history.<br /><br />You also have to realize that the Germans never tried to mount such a gun inside any tank turret. The 17 cm and the longer 15 cm guns were proposed to be on the chassis in some form of superstructure, not a turret.<br /><br />Another flaw in your plans is that the E-100 turm has the same room as the Mausturm does. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00707985834690968512noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-67388104023789623962013-04-03T22:16:49.251+02:002013-04-03T22:16:49.251+02:00well then i have two bad ideas:
First the unhist...well then i have two bad ideas: <br /><br />First the unhistorical one: give it a version of JT gun<br />Second logic fail: erase it and make E75 a T10, it is smaller has god armour and is more agile ( it would get HP nad armour buff)<br /><br />apart from that i dont see how the problem of E 100 can be solvedOdeseyushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12454593264228159769noreply@blogger.com