tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post303117938479704914..comments2023-11-05T11:52:06.343+01:00Comments on For the Record: IS-7 - history and developmentSilentstalkerFTRhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03345351411597408992noreply@blogger.comBlogger33125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-42568526409370060952014-01-28T07:43:18.909+01:002014-01-28T07:43:18.909+01:00Simple WG DON LIKE RUSSIAN THEY ONLY LIKE American...Simple WG DON LIKE RUSSIAN THEY ONLY LIKE American,nazi,france all frm europe the more they buff the more i will use/support only russian tank.no more sweet dream WG pls wake up face the reality RUSSIAN R THE BEST yippyyyyAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13889774913101185673noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-26016349139882849452014-01-28T07:33:14.549+01:002014-01-28T07:33:14.549+01:00Frankly speaking russian tank r the best at that t...Frankly speaking russian tank r the best at that time n its the most op tank but HONESTLY WG DON LIKE RUSSIAN THT WHY THEY MAKE RUSSIAN TANK JUST LIKE SHI....T so no wan will play those tank n thts why russian the only nation will never ever have autoloader Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13889774913101185673noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-54068369388392052672013-04-13T14:34:28.014+02:002013-04-13T14:34:28.014+02:00It's actually S-69, S-70 could have some impro...It's actually S-69, S-70 could have some improvements over it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-66671085800953565182013-04-07T04:00:38.887+02:002013-04-07T04:00:38.887+02:00> No, IRL it was 250mm @ 500m and 240mm @ 100m,...> No, IRL it was 250mm @ 500m and 240mm @ 100m, so close to 260mm @ 0m, which is what WG did.<br /><br />Nope.<br /><br />http://ic.pics.livejournal.com/t_bone_wowp/45665749/3264/3264_1000.pngAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-70817026146155641452013-04-04T08:31:24.746+02:002013-04-04T08:31:24.746+02:00Interesting to note that it was indeed an *autoloa...Interesting to note that it was indeed an *autoloader.* Look at the way the shells are facing in the picture; forwards, towards the gun breech, not backwards away from the gun breech as they would be in a manually loaded gun with power-assist rammer.<br /><br />Those two loaders are just there to keep feeding the autoloader!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-31663408769350086052013-04-03T21:03:38.420+02:002013-04-03T21:03:38.420+02:00 typo obviously 1000kg. apologies
Voll. typo obviously 1000kg. apologies<br />Voll.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-11097064203793776092013-04-03T20:02:14.582+02:002013-04-03T20:02:14.582+02:00If they give all tanks real life status, the briti...If they give all tanks real life status, the british tanks will be better, and keep in mind that the ROF tested is usually in first minute of fight, if u want variable rate of fire in WoT this will do a lot of complainsJibrailnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-47647043411599153172013-04-03T18:36:53.816+02:002013-04-03T18:36:53.816+02:00[i]the penetration of this gun is actually slightl...[i]the penetration of this gun is actually slightly higher than that in real life[/i]<br /><br />No, IRL it was 250mm @ 500m and 240mm @ 100m, so close to 260mm @ 0m, which is what WG did.<br /><br />IRL however it fired 6-8 RPM and could sustain that rof for 14 rounds (two minutes), in game that is not quite true...<br /><br />Also 130mm S-70 WAS NOT naval gun, it had unique ballistics at the time, it's ammo was developed from naval ammo, but it's unique ballistics were obtained by necking down 152mm Canet case (making practically wildcat 130-152mm), using 130mm naval gun barrel with new breachblock, which was developed for 152mm high performance field gun.<br /><br />bojanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17185942985653222470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-325491004194723362013-04-03T18:32:17.499+02:002013-04-03T18:32:17.499+02:00Well was the IS-7 'that' good? I mean a lo...Well was the IS-7 'that' good? I mean a lot of tanks look good on paper but in reality turn out less than satisfactory.fattolerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02315995076317496087noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-62002901315372588422013-04-03T18:29:23.175+02:002013-04-03T18:29:23.175+02:00As you know the IS-7 was slightly OP/outclassing i...As you know the IS-7 was slightly OP/outclassing its top tier enemies like the T30 and the Maus.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-47093265973629239122013-04-03T18:28:46.679+02:002013-04-03T18:28:46.679+02:00There were two IS-5, one was based on IS-1 but wit...There were two IS-5, one was based on IS-1 but with 100mm gun (in game stock IS with 100mm D-10T is close to it), other was (IIRC Viktor could corect me)development prototype that lead to Objekt.701, ie. IS-4 development.<br />Problem with tracking Soviet development is that designations and also Object.xxx numbers periodically repeat, we have Obj.907 medium and light tanks at same time, there were two T-34s, one well known other light tank from '30s etc etc...bojanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17185942985653222470noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-66751373104469286862013-04-03T18:27:48.148+02:002013-04-03T18:27:48.148+02:00I got a question for all of you readers.
Lets say ...I got a question for all of you readers.<br />Lets say the IS-7 never was implented as the first russian tier 10. Lets say it was the IS-4 who became the 1st top tier russian tank. <br />Now we jump to the present and lets say that SerB got a new heavy line for us ending with the IS-7 at top. Would you consider it OP if it was added to the game now or would you think it was UP cus of the bad accuracy and so on.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-76238356197750438742013-04-03T17:12:27.894+02:002013-04-03T17:12:27.894+02:00I can only assume it was metric tonnes.
PS 1t= 10...I can only assume it was metric tonnes.<br /><br />PS 1t= 1000kg<br /><br />About the IS-5, it doesnt seem too interesting to me. Also a lot of the good tank projects were simply named Obj 2**Viktor Kitovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15006480735467688953noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-46353693386758231542013-04-03T17:07:39.623+02:002013-04-03T17:07:39.623+02:00In one of the Q&A the devs said it was one of ...In one of the Q&A the devs said it was one of their biggest mistakes, but by the time they realised that, it was too late to take it out of the game.Viktor Kitovhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15006480735467688953noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-32480264856729856052013-04-03T16:51:40.453+02:002013-04-03T16:51:40.453+02:00I did it for sure, I wonder what they're doing...I did it for sure, I wonder what they're doing in Minsk though. Jokes apart, they said that IS-7 should be tier XII in order to be close to its historical counterpart, then why did they bother to put it in the game to begin with?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-5898814904589620502013-04-03T16:42:25.238+02:002013-04-03T16:42:25.238+02:00Yeah "obvious", for sure. :D
Have you c...Yeah "obvious", for sure. :D<br /><br />Have you cleaned your stalin portrait on the wall today? :DStieger11noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-60379129582042929302013-04-03T16:41:47.198+02:002013-04-03T16:41:47.198+02:00About the IS-5, it looks like an IS-1/2 with a 100...About the IS-5, it looks like an IS-1/2 with a 100mm gun, Russian wikipedia has an article about it: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%98%D0%A1-5Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-41214446294988300242013-04-03T16:31:00.948+02:002013-04-03T16:31:00.948+02:00>Hope that was sarcasm...
No sarcasm intended, ...>Hope that was sarcasm...<br />No sarcasm intended, they give 100mm to the Chinese medium VII but they refuse to give it to the Russian one because of "balance issue", IS-7 is crap compared to the historical one and they won't ever give us a Russian tier VIII medium premium, WG has an obvious anti-russian bias, only fanboys of those nazi crappy tanks wouldn't notice.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-5131480403922761402013-04-03T15:40:17.411+02:002013-04-03T15:40:17.411+02:00Metric system is the best.
Less than 5 countries ...Metric system is the best. <br />Less than 5 countries still use Imperial system (not Star Wars). Including USA which pisses me off.<br /><br />Ontopic: One would ask - where is the IS-5? We got all numbers up to IS-8/T-10. All could I find is that IS-5 was some sort of upgrade on IS-2. <br />Cheers.Worashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05134704651600263428noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-50764029904086417902013-04-03T15:11:58.138+02:002013-04-03T15:11:58.138+02:00Everything in Russia is metric so are we talking m...Everything in Russia is metric so are we talking metric tonnes (100kg) or the Imperial ton or short ton?. I assume metric tonnes in which case I would appreciate you making this clear as a tank-technophile I love the detail. Good article. I'm grinding for one in game right now.<br />-VollkettenAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-13096280805733911262013-04-03T14:59:37.074+02:002013-04-03T14:59:37.074+02:00@Anon
>soviet designs
>good
1/10@Anon<br />>soviet designs<br />>good<br />1/10Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-3307112529429528102013-04-03T14:17:22.991+02:002013-04-03T14:17:22.991+02:00That's somewhat true, certainly the Maus didn&...That's somewhat true, certainly the Maus didn't reach speeds of 20 kmh IRL...fattolerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02315995076317496087noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-86983460436355360692013-04-03T13:51:58.744+02:002013-04-03T13:51:58.744+02:00Naah, they buff German designs that were historica...Naah, they buff German designs that were historically bad or stupid and usually nerf Soviet designs because they would be too good.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-90141297556753926072013-04-03T13:50:02.373+02:002013-04-03T13:50:02.373+02:00Some discussion about 130mm autoloader:
http://20...Some discussion about 130mm autoloader:<br /><br />http://208.84.116.223/forums/index.php?showtopic=37412Theodorehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12839366550533983913noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-803236411311363895.post-13918641006133706632013-04-03T13:47:48.333+02:002013-04-03T13:47:48.333+02:00Hope that was sarcasm...Hope that was sarcasm...Impsamuraihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09847870543715937720noreply@blogger.com